Council archive · source document
Attachment 6 - Stormwater Management Plan and Engineering Response. · MCU23/0078
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (32.8 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
Original PDF page 12, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
The storm durations listed in Table 5 were simulated in XP Storm for each catchment detailed within Table 4 to determine
the critical storm duration for each catchment. Determining the critical storm for each catchment allows the maximum
critical flow to be modelled in the hydraulics scenario, resulting in the maximum flow path through the site.
The following table highlights the peak flows for each catchment associated with the development site at the southern
extents of the study area where the natural drainage channel crosses below Hofmann Drive via a series of box culverts, for
the developed scenario where stormwater quantity detention is provided for all development site sub-catchments.
Table 5: Developed Scenario Critical Peak Flow Runoff (m3/s)
Peak Flow (m3/s) Peak Water Level at
Catchment
10 Year ARI 50 Year ARI 100 Year ARI Hoffman Drive Culverts
North Catchment 6.953 8.417 9.239
4.492m AHD
South Catchment 0.885 1.152 1.345
A comparison between Tables 3 & 5 shows that peak flow discharge and water levels across the Hoffman Drive culvert
crossing are not increasing for both catchments in the development scenario. Thus, this flood assessment has determined
that the proposed development will not worsen downstream water levels and flood extents across Hoffman Drive.
The results of the developed scenario flood assessment including water level depths, elevations, and velocities during the
1% AEP storm event (in the 2100 Year planning period) can be found in Appendix E. Developed flood levels are also shown
in the Earthworks Sections on Drawing C-DA020 in Appendix B.
4.2 DETAILED HYDRAULIC MODELLING – XP STORM – DETENTION SIZING
4.2.1 Existing Scenario Model
Initially the existing XP Storm model was built using catchments’ parameters outlined in Table 6. The initial and continuing
loss properties were assumed from site investigations and recent experience with stormwater modelling in the subject
area.
Table 6: XP Storm Existing Model Parameters
Parameter Lot 3 Lot 7 - North Lot 7 - South
Pervious Impervious Pervious Impervious Pervious Impervious
Data Data Data Data Data Data
Area (ha) 2.979 - 0.249 - 0.338 -
Slope (%) 2.0 2.4 2.0
Mannings ‘n’ 0.160 - 0.160 - 0.160 -
Initial Loss
27 0 27 0 27 0
(mm)
Continuing
2.6 0 2.6 0 2.6 0
Loss (mm/hr)
Laurenson ‘n’ -0.285 -0.285 -0.285 -0.285 -0.285 -0.285
4.2.2 Results for Existing Scenario
Table 7, Table 8, and Table 9 indicates the existing total peak discharge rate for the site as outputted by XP storm for both
Lot 3 and the two sub-catchments of Lot 7 (North and South). The critical storm duration for the existing catchment was
determined by simulating all storm events from the 1 to 100-year ARI storm events for 20, 25, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 and 180-
minute durations. The critical storm events can be seen within tables below.
www.bornhorstward.com.au Page 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 6 - Stormwater Management Plan and Engineering Response..pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 32.8 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.