Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - Stormwater Managment Plan
The original of this document is very large (17.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnSQIDEP Evaluation SPEL Basin, Sippy Downs
Performance Performance Requirement Monitoring action or result Compliance or
Criteria non
compliance
cartridge of sorts – both of which
would typically be credited with
gross pollutant capture. The
caveat here is that every
installation of SPEL Basin must
include a SPEL Sack at the entry
pit.
Performance ER and CRE. If CRE average and median > 10% difference Both ER and average CRE was Compliance.
Indicators inspect dataset. reported. The evaluators
determined the median CRE and
found median CRE aligned very
closely with ER and the difference
was less than 10%. The
difference between ER and
average CRE was found to be >
10%. It was agreed with the
Applicant that an average of ER
and average CRE would be
adopted as a conservative
approach that enables both
metrics to be used and gives
them equal weighting. We note
that adoption of average CRE in
lieu of median CRE reduced the
18
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.