Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

Information Request Response

Attached to the e-mail Applicants Response to Information Request - MCU20/0159 OPW20/0245 - 11 Vision Court, Noosaville.

of 4

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Issue – Eastern Elevation
The eastern elevation contains four large roller doors. It is not clear what the purpose of the
roller doors is, noting that they are only accessible over proposed landscaped areas.

Information Required
4. Provide clarification on the proposed roller doors on the western elevation.

Response
The purpose of the roller doors is to permit natural light and ventilation for the building. This
is a typical design solution for larger buildings which eliminates operable windows and glass
and provides a practical solution to generating passive air flow into a space. Please refer to
the attached and revised plans prepared by Building Suncoast Green which include the
omitted text to this effect.

Issue – End of Trip Facilities
The proposal is required to provide six bicycle spaces, in accordance with the Driveways
and Parking Code. It is unclear whether the ‘Bicycle Store’ indicated on the Floor Plan is
sufficient in size to comply with the requirement.

Information Required
5. Provide clarification on proposed bicycle spaces, in compliance with the Driveways and
Parking Code.

Response
Please refer to the attached and revised proposal plans prepared by Building Suncoast
Green which nominates a total of six (6) bicycle parking spaces split into 2 bays at either
side at the rear of the tenancy.

Issue – Loading Bay
It is not clear that a semi-trailer can reverse into the proposed loading bay.

Information Required
6. Demonstrate that, given the existing road configuration, the reverse entry manoeuvre,
as detailed in AS 2890.2-2002, is achievable.

Response
As part of addressing issue number 7 Empire Engineers undertook a swept path analysis of
a WCV manoeuvring into the site. Whilst it does not directly demonstrate reverse manoeuvre
into the proposed loading bay set down area, we believe the swept path gives reason that a
similar sized vehicle can enter the site in either a forward or reversed direction or exit the site
in a similar fashion. Further to this, Vision Court is not a through road and traffic is expected
Log in to download the original file

Information Request Response.pdf · 710 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.