Original source · versioned page text
Swmp
Very large file (28.6 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 20, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Peak flow rates for the median design storms for the developed site are given in Table 6.4
Table 6.4 – Developed Site Peak Flow Rates (L/s)
Storm Event Q1 Q2 Q5 Q10 Q20 Q50 Q100
(1EY) (0.5EY) (0.2EY) (10%AEP) (5%AEP) (2%AEP) (1%AEP)
Cat A 124 156 193 233 270 321 359
Developed PFR
Cat B 60 75 93 111 129 149 166
Developed PFR
(PFR – Peak Flow Rate)
6.1.4 Peak Flow Comparison
Table 6.5 indicates the increased peak flow rates for the developed cases.
Table 6.5 – Comparison of Existing Vs Developed Peak Flows (L/s)
AEP Storm Q1 Q2 Q5 Q10 Q20 Q50 Q100
(1EY) (0.5EY) (0.2EY) (10%AEP) (5%AEP) (2%AEP) (1%AEP)
Cat A 45 37 33 47 52 62 72
Increase PFR
Cat B 33 36 41 52 60 66 75
Increase PFR
(PFR – Peak Flow Rate )
As shown in Table 6.5 Stormwater peak discharge will increase as a result of the proposed development
due to the increase in impervious area. Therefore, it is proposed to utilise two On Site Detention (OSD)
systems to mitigate the peak stormwater discharge rates from the proposed development prior to
discharging to the lawful point of discharge as discussed in section 4.2.
6.1.5 Peak Flow Mitigation (OSD)
To mitigate the peak flow increase from the developed site, it is proposed to include a mixture of
inground detention tanks located under the proposed driveway and inground open bio retention basins
that include a volume dedicated to on site detention of stormwater runoff.
SCG Consulting Engineers Page 18 SCG Ref: 33132(SWMP).RevB
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.