Council archive · source document
RFI - Attachment 4 - Traffic Impact Statement · MCU22/0094
Very large file (10.8 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 2, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd SLR Ref: 620.30735.00000-L01-v1.1 IR Cover letter
Nossaville Childcare Centre 2023 03 30.docx
Lot 4, Noosa Business Centre Date: 30 March 2023
Response to Council Information Request Item 12-15
Item 13
Visitor parking for childcare centres would be user class 3A, requiring either wider parking spaces or a wider
parking aisle to comply with AS/NZS2890.1-2004.
To inform Council’s assessment the following response is provided:
• Refer to Section 4 of the updated TIS which provided details in relation to the selection of parking user
class.
Item 14
The basis of the proposed relaxation in Council’s parking requirement for childcare centres is not supported.
There is no overflow parking available in the street, so the implications of not having sufficient on-site parking
is heightened. In addition, it is noted that the 15 staff is based on the statutory requirement for the number
of children based on their age groupings. There will also be a director, and a cook at the very least in addition
to the 15 educators. Modify the proposal to comply with Council’s parking requirements.
To inform Council’s assessment the following response is provided:
• Refer to Section 5 of the updated TIS which has been expanded to include further consideration of
parking provision beyond that previously documented including surveys of comparable childcare
tenancies.
Item 15
In the current proposal the only means of moving between cars in the carpark and the front door of the centre
is via the parking aisle and the shared space beside the disabled parking bay. That is not an appropriate
solution for a childcare centre from a movement safety perspective. Amend the proposal to include a pathway
between the carpark and the building, with users of those parking spaces having direct access to that pathway,
and visitor spaces being nominated in those spaces that nose up to the pathway.
To inform Council’s assessment the following response is provided:
• The design has been amended to include a linkage between the carpark and the building, with users
of those parking spaces having direct access to that pathway, and visitor spaces being nominated in
those spaces that nose up to the pathway.
Yours sincerely
BRENDYN RHEINBERGER
Checked/
Authorised by:
Initials
Page 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
RFI - Attachment 4 - Traffic Impact Statement.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.8 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.