Original source · versioned page text
Appendix B - Amended Biome Consulting Response
Attached to the e-mail Amended Biome Report - stormwater in addition to Information Response - MCU170551 - 20 Trading Post Road Cooroy.msg.
The original of this document is very large (16.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
TABLES
Table 1-1: Approved Bioretention Basin Sizing ........................................................................ 1
Table 1-2: Summary of Responses to Approval Conditions Relating to Stormwater
Management ........................................................................................................ 3
Table 3-1: Existing Scenario Catchment Details ................................................................... 7
Table 3-2: XP-RAFTS Calibration Parameter Summary ....................................................... 8
Table 3-3: Existing Peak Flow Results .................................................................................. 8
Table 3-4: Existing Peak Flow Comparison at Discharge Location B ................................... 9
Table 3-5: Developed Mitigated Scenario Catchment Details ............................................... 9
Table 3-6: Stormwater Detention Basin Concept Details .................................................... 11
Table 3-7: Northern Basin Stage Storage Discharge Relationship ..................................... 11
Table 3-8: Central Basin Stage Storage Discharge Relationship ........................................ 12
Table 3-9: Developed Mitigated Scenario Peak Flow Comparison ..................................... 12
Table 3-10: Developed Mitigated Scenario Basin Water Surface Levels .............................. 13
Table 3-11: Extreme Storm Event Weir Assessment ............................................................ 13
Table 4-1: Load Reduction Water Quality Objectives .......................................................... 15
Table 4-2: Bioretention Basin Modelled Parameters ........................................................... 19
Table 4-3: Generic Node Treatment Removal Efficiency (Aged Care Facility) ................... 20
Table 4-4: Pond Node Configuration ................................................................................... 20
Table 4-5: 20th Percentile Hydraulic Residence Time Results (Simplistic Approach).......... 21
Table 4-6: MUSIC Modelling Results .................................................................................. 21
FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Approximate Location of Site (Source: UBD 2006) .............................................. 5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A CONCEPT MASTERPLAN LAYOUT
APPENDIX B RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATION
APPENDIX C DETENTION BASIN CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX D XP-RAFTS LAYOUT SUMMARY
APPENDIX E STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX F MUSIC MODELLING DETAILS
APPENDIX G CONCEPT DRAWINGS
APPENDIX H OPERATIONAL WORKS DRAWINGS
APPENDIX I COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.