Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Compiled Information Request Response
The original of this document is very large (65.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 30, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Noosa Civic Expansion
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
representation of individual roads. Extending this value across the entire network is therefore
considered to be appropriate.
4.6 Traffic
“Council has observed many two-lane roundabouts within the coastal road network at which
actual queue lengths do not match modelled queue lengths (from programs such as SIDRA). This
is considered to be primarily due to upstream departure issues.
Information Required:
43 Amended SIDRA analyses of existing and projected traffic volumes calibrated against
observed queue lengths, particularly at the more critical intersections. The queue
length measurements should be based on individual approach lanes and traffic
counts should be lane-specific because it is likely that lane utilisation is not optimal
because of upstream and downstream intersection issues.”
RESPONSE
The SIDRA computer analysis package is a recognised and industry accepted analysis tool that
does not require calibration against local conditions.
SIDRA is considered an appropriate assessment and analysis tool because it uses the same
adopted parameters for the base case and with-development traffic scenarios. This allows for
direct assessment of the development traffic impacts.
The traffic analysis which was provided with the development application is considered sufficient
to identify traffic impacts at the relevant intersections with and without development traffic. As
such, Noosa Shire Council has been provided with sufficient information to consider and assess
development traffic impacts.
Please refer to Appendix D – Traffic and Transport Response.
4.7 Traffic
“Traffic volumes on the Noosa coastal road network significantly increase during holiday periods,
roughly corresponding with school holiday periods. Consequently, traffic assessments over a long
period of time have been based on desirable maximum roundabout degrees of saturation during
non-holiday periods being 0.70 (rather than 0.85) to allow tolerable traffic congestion during peak
holiday periods.
Information Required:
44 The analyses submitted should include assessments of intersection performance
during peak holiday periods.”
RESPONSE
Traffic capacity analysis during holiday periods is not considered to be a necessary or reasonable
impact assessment for conventional developments, such as the one proposed by the Applicant.
The traffic analysis which was provided with the development application is considered sufficient
to identify traffic impacts at the relevant intersections with and without development traffic. As
such, Noosa Shire Council has been provided with sufficient information to consider and assess
development traffic impacts.
Please refer to Appendix D – Traffic and Transport Response.
4.8 Parking Rates
“The information submitted to date is considered insufficient to justify relaxations of Council’s
planning scheme requirements to the extent proposed.
June 2015 Cardno HRP 28
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.