Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Compiled Information Request Response

of 281

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (65.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Original PDF page 30, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

                                                                                                      Noosa Civic Expansion
                        28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive



            representation of individual roads. Extending this value across the entire network is therefore
            considered to be appropriate.

4.6         Traffic
            “Council has observed many two-lane roundabouts within the coastal road network at which
            actual queue lengths do not match modelled queue lengths (from programs such as SIDRA). This
            is considered to be primarily due to upstream departure issues.

            Information Required:
            43   Amended SIDRA analyses of existing and projected traffic volumes calibrated against
                 observed queue lengths, particularly at the more critical intersections. The queue
                 length measurements should be based on individual approach lanes and traffic
                 counts should be lane-specific because it is likely that lane utilisation is not optimal
                 because of upstream and downstream intersection issues.”
            RESPONSE
            The SIDRA computer analysis package is a recognised and industry accepted analysis tool that
            does not require calibration against local conditions.
            SIDRA is considered an appropriate assessment and analysis tool because it uses the same
            adopted parameters for the base case and with-development traffic scenarios. This allows for
            direct assessment of the development traffic impacts.
            The traffic analysis which was provided with the development application is considered sufficient
            to identify traffic impacts at the relevant intersections with and without development traffic. As
            such, Noosa Shire Council has been provided with sufficient information to consider and assess
            development traffic impacts.
            Please refer to Appendix D – Traffic and Transport Response.

4.7         Traffic
            “Traffic volumes on the Noosa coastal road network significantly increase during holiday periods,
            roughly corresponding with school holiday periods. Consequently, traffic assessments over a long
            period of time have been based on desirable maximum roundabout degrees of saturation during
            non-holiday periods being 0.70 (rather than 0.85) to allow tolerable traffic congestion during peak
            holiday periods.

            Information Required:
            44   The analyses submitted should include assessments of intersection performance
                 during peak holiday periods.”
            RESPONSE
            Traffic capacity analysis during holiday periods is not considered to be a necessary or reasonable
            impact assessment for conventional developments, such as the one proposed by the Applicant.
            The traffic analysis which was provided with the development application is considered sufficient
            to identify traffic impacts at the relevant intersections with and without development traffic. As
            such, Noosa Shire Council has been provided with sufficient information to consider and assess
            development traffic impacts.
            Please refer to Appendix D – Traffic and Transport Response.

4.8         Parking Rates
            “The information submitted to date is considered insufficient to justify relaxations of Council’s
            planning scheme requirements to the extent proposed.


June 2015                                           Cardno HRP                                                           28
Log in to download the original file

MCU14_0106 & OPW15_0001 Compiled Information Request Response.pdf · 65.9 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.