Original source · versioned page text
Appendix 5 - Code Table Assessment
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0061 Development Application - Appendix 4, 5, 6 & 7 Email 2 of 2.
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
The monopole was selected for
the proposal due to its slim line
appearance and minimal visual
obtrusiveness when viewed
from a distance.
The monopole design is deemed
to be more appropriate than a
lattice tower as it can be
painted a colour (at Council’s
request) that will provide for
visual integration and
camouflage the facility with the
surrounding landscape and
vegetation.
Roof form S13.1 With the exception of O13 - Not applicable.
O13 Roof forms— industrial The proposed development
a) contribute positively to buildings the main roof of does not involve a building.
the local skyline; the building has a roof pitch
b) complement the low rise no less than 12 degrees and
character of the locality; has minimum 600mm eaves
c) use simple traditional to at least 75% of
roof designs, such as the perimeter of the
hipped, gabled and skillion; building;
and
d) do not create AND
opportunities for residents
to overlook the private open S13.2 Building and
space areas of neighbouring structures do not include
properties. rooftop terraces.
NBN-4BBZ-4GYM-5125 – David Cootharaba Page 70
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.