Original source · versioned page text
Appendix 5 - Code Table Assessment
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0061 Development Application - Appendix 4, 5, 6 & 7 Email 2 of 2.
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
horse riders; or character areas. Additionally
c) provide habitat the subject site is not identified
connectivity for wildlife; on the Pathways and Trunk
d) protect watercourses and Network Infrastructure Map as
drainage lines; being located within proximity
e) protect vegetation on of any pathways or bikepaths.
steep slopes; and Notwithstanding this the
f) form a scenic backdrop proposed facility will be setback
for residential development. behind mature vegetation
which will screen the facility
from the surrounding locality.
Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Rural Zone
4.30 Consistent Uses
O53 The following defined No solution provided O53 - Not applicable
uses and use classes are (refer to comment below).
consistent uses and are
located in the Rural Zone—
a) All Agricultural Uses;
b) Commercial business
Type 3;
c) Home-based business;
d) Industrial business Type
3;
e) Retail business Type 1 if
a roadside stall;
f) Retail business Type 3;
g) Emergency service Type
2;
h) Open space Type 2;
i) Detached house;
j) Community residence;
k) Ancillary dwelling unit;
l) Multiple housing Type 1;
and
m) Visitor accommodation
Types 1, 2 or 3.
4.31 Inconsistent Uses
O54 The following defined No solution provided O54- Does not comply.
uses and use classes are The proposed development is
inconsistent uses and are identified as an Infrastructural
not located in the Rural Use –Type 3 ‘Tower’ under the
NBN-4BBZ-4GYM-5125 – David Cootharaba Page 75
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.