Original source · versioned page text
Appendix 5 - Code Table Assessment
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0061 Development Application - Appendix 4, 5, 6 & 7 Email 2 of 2.
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Compliance
vegetation removal will
be required;
o Significant areas of
mature vegetation also
exist within the
surrounding area which
will help to further
mitigate potential visual
impacts associated with
the development.
Therefore although identified as
an inconsistent land use, the
proposed facility is considered
compatible with development
in the surrounding area and is
appropriate in this location.
4.32 Effects of Use
Sloping sites & ridgelines S55.1 Buildings and O55 - Not applicable.
O55 Development on associated The development is not located
sloping sites— accessways are not on a sloping site or ridgeline.
a) is responsive to the constructed on land with a
natural topography of the slope greater than 1 in 4
site and minimises the need (25%);
for cut and fill
b) does not visually AND
dominate the hill slope or
interrupt the skyline; S55.2 Buildings present no
c) is integrated with the more than 2 storeys at any
natural site characteristics one point when viewed
including vegetation; from the road or other
public space; and are
AND designed to step down the
slope or use suspended floor
O56 The landscape construction;
character and visual
amenity quality of hill AND
slopes and ridgelines are
retained. S56.1 On properties with a
slope exceeding 1 in 4 (25%)
or located on ridgelines
visible from the major road
NBN-4BBZ-4GYM-5125 – David Cootharaba Page 77
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.