Original source · versioned page text
2020-10-06 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT 6 OCTOBER 2020
Table 1: Option Costs with pros & cons
Option Cost Description Footpath Standard Asset life Primary Pros & Cons
Estimate
1 $0 Do nothing – keep as is. None as not complying Approx. 0-3 years Pros Cons
with certifier report. Nil initial cost. Defers costs.
Defers decision.
Asset likely to deteriorate.
Resident and community
concerns.
Safety risk.
2 $60,000 Remove temporary timber None as not complying 25 years for Pros Cons
handrails. with certifier report. concrete path. Protects remaining Not to Australian standard.
Protect concrete footpath Limited engineering concrete path to extend Restricts community use.
batters. improvements. asset life. Lack of handrail presents
Provides residents with safety risk.
uninterrupted views
Lower cost.
No need to maintain path
unless in use.
Able to be accessed for
weeding by Council only.
3 $65,000 Remove temporary timber None as not complying 25 years for Pros Cons
handrails. with certifier report. concrete path. Lower initial cost. Not to Australian standard.
Protect concrete footpath Protects concrete path to Restricts community use.
batters. extend life. Lack of handrail presents
Remove end sections of path. Removes temporary safety risk.
handrail likely to fail.
Provides uninterrupted
views.
Addresses residents’
concerns.
Able to be accessed for
weeding by Council only.
Page 28 of 73
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.