Council archive · source document
Minor Change Existing Approval MCU21 0117 02 & OPW21 1099 02 (As Published) · OPW21/0199.02
Pavement Design and Construction
68. The pavement designs shown on the engineering drawings are not approved. To attain
approval for the pavement design, the following details must be submitted to Council and
certified by an RPEQ with the proposed pavement design:
a. The design CBR must be based on the four day soaked CBR value for the subgrade
material;
b. The design subgrade CBR must be representative of each homogenous insitu section
of finished subgrade. With respect to each section:
i. For four or less test results, the design CBR must be taken as the least estimated
insitu CBR result;
ii. For five or more test results, the design CBR must be taken as the 10th percentile
of all estimated insitu CBR results.
c. The samples must be taken generally in the position of the outer wheel path on both
sides of the proposed road. A sketch plan showing the location of all tests must be
submitted with the test results for pavement design approval; and
d. Where imported material has been (or is proposed to be) used for subgrade
replacement, and the depth of the imported material is less than 300mm, the pavement
design CBR must be based on the testing results of the insitu material and not the
imported material.
69. At the time of subgrade inspection, the subgrade must exhibit no visible signs of deformation
under proof rolling by a fully loaded water truck. The pavement subgrade will not be passed
until this requirement has been achieved.
70. Pavement design for privately owned works must be undertaken in accordance with the
relevant standards. Structural integrity of the driveway and car park areas will remain the
responsibility of the property owner/developer and must be certified by an RPEQ.
Works within Road Reserve/Reinstatement
71. Safe pedestrian access on all streets in the vicinity of the development must be maintained
at all times. Should footpath/road closures be necessary to carry out construction works,
Council’s Engineering Officer must be notified prior to the proposed closure and all
requirements complied with.
72. All frontage works must match neatly with existing road and verge/footpath features.
Additional works beyond the frontage may be required to provide an acceptable transition to
existing road and verge/footpath profiles.
73. The verge is to be modified such that the maximum crossfall for the verge is 5%, except in
the location of a pathway where the maximum crossfall is to be 2.5%.
74. Electrical conduits or other services proposed to be installed within existing and proposed
road reserves under existing sealed carriageways, concrete pathways, concrete/sealed
driveways or significant vegetation must be installed by boring. Trenching is not permitted,
unless specifically approved by Council.
Pathways
75. All pathways must be constructed in accordance with the following requirements:
a. All footpaths must comply with Council’s Standard Drawing SEQ R-065;
b. All paths must have a slip resistant surface;
c. Expansion and contraction joints must provide a flush finish. Installation of joints by
saw cutting is preferred to ensure a smooth ride for cyclists; and
d. The required work includes any modifications to ensure the footpath finishes flush with
all existing service covers and the like, or alternatively these services are raised or
altered, so as not to create a pedestrian safety hazard.
Page 13 of 31
Document Set ID: 24681870
Version: 7, Version Date: 17/04/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Existing Approval MCU21 0117 02 & OPW21 1099 02 (As Published).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
Minor Change Existing Approval MCU21 0117 02 & OPW21 1099 02 (As Published).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 924 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.