Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

08/1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1787

of 96

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (24.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

-*s

2.1. An amended analysis of the Gross Floor Area to the Basement and Retail areas on the
lower ground level (Dwg No.Sk4004). The drawing provided appears to incorrectly
position the basement/storey demarcation line, as the line does not correlate to the
natural ground levels for the site. Please amend the GFA calculation accordingly.

Response: The basement level and calculation of GFA has been undertaken in accordance with the
Noosa Plan definitions for basement and GFA. In accordance with the definition of basement, the
basement ceiling height projects no more than one metre above both natural ground surface and
finished ground level. Drawing sk4004 highlights the basement line used for distinguishing between the
basement area and ground level retail/GFA area. This line has been determined based on the 5m
contour level (also highlighted). The area included as basement and excluded from GFA does not have a
ceiling height projecting more than 1m above the 5m contour level. As a comparison to other Hastings
Street developments and previous measure of basement/GFA, a sketch is included in Appendix A
showing the basement/ground level for nearby developments at 31, 33 and 35 Hastings Street also
highlighting the 5m contour level in relation to areas calculated as basement and GFA.

2.2. An amended public access path along the western boundary to provide a minimum
width of 3 metres, improved visibility from Hastings Street, improved visual corridor
toward main beach and reduce potential pedestrian conflicts with the restaurant
outdoor dining area. ‘

Response: The proposed public access path along the western boundary has been amended such that it

is generally 3 metres wide. This is shown on drawing no.’s sk2000 and sk6001.

2.3. The extent of any retaining structures required along the boundaries to the site.

Response: Cross sections have been prepared to demonstrate the relationship between the subject site

and adjoining properties. This is shown on drawing no.’s sk6000 — sk6003. These sections show that

the proposed design levels will coordinate and link with existing adjoining levels and will not compromise

the structural integrity of the neighbouring buildings.

2.4, Reduced Levels to roof areas and rooftop structures.

Response: Proposed finished levels of the roof areas and rooftop structures have been shown on

drawing no.’s sk2004, sk3100 and sk3101.

2.5. Proposed Finished Levels to the Ground Floor and Pool Deck areas, in particular the
terrace and pool areas to the Main Beach frontage.

Response: Proposed finished levels to the Ground Floor and Pool Deck areas have been shown on

drawing no. sk2001.

2.6. A detailed perspective of the proposed roof terrace sunshading structure.

Response: A detailed perspective of the proposed roof terrace structure is shown on drawing no.
sk6004.

gt

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
24.0 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 24.0 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.