Council archive · source document
08/1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1787
Very large file (24.0 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
-*s 2.1. An amended analysis of the Gross Floor Area to the Basement and Retail areas on the lower ground level (Dwg No.Sk4004). The drawing provided appears to incorrectly position the basement/storey demarcation line, as the line does not correlate to the natural ground levels for the site. Please amend the GFA calculation accordingly. Response: The basement level and calculation of GFA has been undertaken in accordance with the Noosa Plan definitions for basement and GFA. In accordance with the definition of basement, the basement ceiling height projects no more than one metre above both natural ground surface and finished ground level. Drawing sk4004 highlights the basement line used for distinguishing between the basement area and ground level retail/GFA area. This line has been determined based on the 5m contour level (also highlighted). The area included as basement and excluded from GFA does not have a ceiling height projecting more than 1m above the 5m contour level. As a comparison to other Hastings Street developments and previous measure of basement/GFA, a sketch is included in Appendix A showing the basement/ground level for nearby developments at 31, 33 and 35 Hastings Street also highlighting the 5m contour level in relation to areas calculated as basement and GFA. 2.2. An amended public access path along the western boundary to provide a minimum width of 3 metres, improved visibility from Hastings Street, improved visual corridor toward main beach and reduce potential pedestrian conflicts with the restaurant outdoor dining area. ‘ Response: The proposed public access path along the western boundary has been amended such that it is generally 3 metres wide. This is shown on drawing no.’s sk2000 and sk6001. 2.3. The extent of any retaining structures required along the boundaries to the site. Response: Cross sections have been prepared to demonstrate the relationship between the subject site and adjoining properties. This is shown on drawing no.’s sk6000 — sk6003. These sections show that the proposed design levels will coordinate and link with existing adjoining levels and will not compromise the structural integrity of the neighbouring buildings. 2.4, Reduced Levels to roof areas and rooftop structures. Response: Proposed finished levels of the roof areas and rooftop structures have been shown on drawing no.’s sk2004, sk3100 and sk3101. 2.5. Proposed Finished Levels to the Ground Floor and Pool Deck areas, in particular the terrace and pool areas to the Main Beach frontage. Response: Proposed finished levels to the Ground Floor and Pool Deck areas have been shown on drawing no. sk2001. 2.6. A detailed perspective of the proposed roof terrace sunshading structure. Response: A detailed perspective of the proposed roof terrace structure is shown on drawing no. sk6004. gt
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/1787 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
0019DFEA.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
About this file
- File size
- 24.0 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.