Original source · versioned page text
Town Planning Assessment Report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (15.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
AO7.5 above. The proposal presents as low
Editor's note—refer to figure rise built form with a height of
AP3-13A less than 8 metres. The
proposal includes a basement,
and from most vantage points,
appears to be one storey. The
proposal is located at the rear
of the site and is not sighted
from the street frontage,
minimising the appearance of
bulk to the street. The
adjoining site to the west is
zoned as Environmental
Management and Conservation
and the site to the east is Rural
and appears to be vacant.
The proposal is located within
an existing cleared area in
order to retain existing
vegetation. The Ecological
Assessment Report confirms
that the site no longer support
ecological values due to
previous clearing. The Report
also confirms the proposal is
sited outside of mapped koala
habitat areas, and proposes no
additional clearing.
The proposal is considered
compliant with PO7.
PO8 AO8.4 Complies with PO8
Notwithstanding that intensive In addition to the The proposal has been
rural activities may need circumstances of AO8.1, to designed and sited to be within
greater separation distances, AO8.3 above, buildings and an existing cleared area. The
buildings and other structures structures meet the following Ecological Assessment Report
are appropriately sited and minimum boundary setbacks: also confirms this area no
designed to: longer supports ecological
1. 20 metres from a property values, with no further
1. avoid environmental harm
boundary of adjoining land vegetation clearing required to
or nuisance to sensitive
in the Environmental accommodate the proposed
land uses, including
management and development, thereby avoiding
adverse impacts on
conservation zone; any further environmental
amenity values, over and
above what could 2. a distance greater than the impacts. Significant
reasonably be expected in width of the riparian buffer rehabilitation works are
the rural zone; area shown on Biodiversity, proposed through the site as
Waterways and Wetland part of the proposed dwelling
2. avoid adverse impact on
Overlay maps; house.
ecologically important
areas including National 3. 10 metres from a road
Parks, watercourses, and frontage; and
wetlands; 4. 10 metres from the side
3. mitigate risks associated and rear boundaries or 6
with the use of chemicals metres where the lot area
13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.