Original source · versioned page text
Appendix B - Code Compliance Tables
Attached to the e-mail Resort Drive, Noosa heads - Access Easement @ CTS Reconfiguration of a Lot - REC17/0022.
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COMMENT
Complies – All filling and excavation works necessary to support the
approved multiple dwellings over the subject land have been
considered as part of the associated multiple dwelling approvals. The
intended strategy is not intended to change as a consequence of the
proposed reconfiguration.
Landscaping and visual amenity
Complies – Landscape design associated with the multiple dwelling
approvals over the subject land will not change as a consequence of
the proposed reconfiguration.
Complies – As demonstrated with the associated multiple dwelling
MCU approvals over the subject land, vegetation clearing is intended
to be restricted to that which is necessary to accommodate the
approved built form. All buildings will be setback a minimum of 12m
from the eastern and southern property boundary to mitigate
potential bushfire risk.
Not applicable – The proposal is for a reconfiguration of a lot only.
Notwithstanding, built form approved by the associated multiple
dwelling MCU approvals has been assessed (and approved) as
appropriate in terms of visual amenity.
Page 15 of 20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.