Original source · versioned page text
2016-11-08 S&O Agenda - Item 3, Attachment 1 - Local Economic Plan
The original of this document is very large (15.1 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Financial Statements 2016
Noosa Shire Council
Notes to the Financial Statements
for the year ended 30 June 2016
Note 12. Fair Value Measurements (continued)
(3) Valuation techniques used to derive Level 2 and Level 3 Fair Values
Where Council is unable to derive Fair Valuations using quoted market prices of identical assets
(ie. Level1 inputs) Council instead utilises a spread of both observable inputs (Level2 inputs) and
unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs).
The Fair Valuation techniques Council has employed while utilising Level 2 and Level 3 inputs are as follows:
Infrastructure, Property, Plant and Equipment
Land (Level 2 and 3)
Land fair values were determined by independent valuer, AssetVal Pty Ltd effective 1 January 2014. Fair values have
been derived based on a combination of market approach and direct comparison by analysing land sales occurring over
the past year within the Noosa Shire Council area.
Where there was an active and liquid market as evidenced by sales transactions of similar property types, a market
approach by way of direct comparison or income methods can be utilised, and are accepted vaiuaUon methodologies
under AASB 13. If a market approach is adopted, the valuation is deemed to be a Level 2 input.
The direct comparison method which is considered a Level 2 input on the fair value hierarchy, involves the analysis of
sales evidence and comparisons with the subject land taking Into account matters such as area, location and other
general site characteristics. Direct Comparison approach was utilised in the assessment for all Council land assets,
however, the fair value measurement has been either a Level 2 or 3, depending on the assumptions as to:
- Whether the land is subject to restrictions as to use and/or sale;
• Whether there is no active market.
Land that is utilised for footpath or access restriction purposes, land that is a volumetric title, or due to its general
characteristics land that has no observable active market have been assessed as a Level 3.
Asset Val Pty Ltd were engaged to undertake an indexation assessment across all non current asset categories with the
exception of Other Infrastructure as at 30 June 2016. It was detennined that land index rates for the period 1 January
2014 to 30 June 2016 showed a material increase of 11% in level2 inputs and 0% for level3 inputs. As a result of this
assessment a desktop revaluation was applied reflecting these indicies.
page 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.