Council archive · source document
Attachment 4 - Geotech Report · MCU23/0030
50 NOOSA PARADE, NOOSA HEADS PROPOSED RESIDENCE 5.4 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Table 2 summarises the results of geotechnical classification laboratory testing conducted on a soil sample recovered from borehole BH2. The laboratory test certificate is presented in Appendix B. Table 2: Summary of Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Particle Size Distribution Atterberg Limits Borehole Depth (m) No. Fines Sand Content Coarse Plasticity Liquid Content * (%) ** (%) Fraction *** (%) Index (%) Limit (%) BH2 2.6 – 3.0 7 93 93 N/P - Note: * Fines Content is the percentage of clay/silt fraction in the soil sample ** Sand Content taken as % retained on 0.075 mm sieve less % passing 2.36 mm *** Coarse Fraction taken as % retained on 2.36 mm sieve. N/P Denotes Non-Plastic Laboratory testing of the sample from borehole BH2 indicates that the material tested comprised silty sand with non-plastic fines. 6.0 ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT 6.1 Earthworks Architectural drawings indicate that the proposed residential structure will include a single level basement, with two storeys above. Bulk excavations for the basement are expected to extend to around 3 m depth, and excavations to around 2 m depth will also be required locally for the pool to the north of the residence. 6.1.1 Site Preparation Following removal of the existing building, pavements and associated elements, together with clearing of vegetation; all tree stumps, footings and remnant internal services should be ‘grubbed out’. Any organic rich topsoil should then be stripped and set aside. Organic topsoils and garden soils must not be re-used as structural fill (off-site), however may be retained on site for later use across landscaping areas, if required. 6.1.2 Excavations Excavations for the basement in the order of about 3 m BGL are expected to be mostly within relatively loose to medium dense sands (fill and natural), with some firm sandy clay. Excavations to the design level should be achievable using medium to large (14 to 30 tonne) excavators with toothed bucket attachments. The standing groundwater table was recorded during the investigation at around 1.8 m to 2 m BGL. Depth to groundwater may vary and is expected to be largely influenced by rainfall patterns and the adjacent river level which is tidal. Excavations for the basement are therefore expected to extend into the groundwater table and, considering that the basement excavations will be relatively close to the eastern and western site boundaries, battering is not likely to be feasible. Temporary shoring of the excavation will be required and is discussed in Section 6.2. The pool excavation will encroach close to groundwater level and consideration should be given to raising the level of the pool so as to avoid intersecting the groundwater table, otherwise temporary retention may also be required for the pool excavation. 2 February 2023 Report No. 22500-001-Rev0 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 4 - Geotech Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.