Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

1.3 Prelodgement Meeting

Attached to the e-mail IDAS Forms - MCU16/0098 & OPW16/0183.

of 3

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

- PRE-LODGEMENT NOTES
lege] NOOSA COUNCIL
PRELODGEMENT ADVICE SERVICES

PLANNING ASSESSMENT BRANCH

 

1. PLM DETAILS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date 26/04/2016 | Application No __| PLM16/0012

Applicant BUILDING SUNCOAST GREEN

Applicant | Name Title/Organisation

Attendees | DEBBIE JOHNSON BUILDING SUNCOAST GREEN
WIL JOHNSON BUILDING SUNCOAST GREEN
PAM THOMSON NOOSA CHOCOLATE FACTORY
CHRIS THOMSON NOOSA CHOCOLATE FACTORY

 

ANDREW THOMSON NOOSA CHOCOLATE FACTORY

 

 

 

Council Name Title/Branch
Attendees | DENIS WALLACE COORDINATOR PLANNING
MARK LEWIS COORDINATOR OPERATIONAL WORKS

 

 

 

 

2. PLANNING SCHEME INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development Type opw [| | ro. [x[ mcu | | BA
Level of Assessment Code 4 Impact
Planning Locality Noosaville

Zone Industry

Overlays Potential Acid Sulphate Soils

 

 

 

3. PLM PROPOSAL

 

 

 

Street Address 50 GATEWAY DR NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566
Real Property Description | LOT 81 SP 211687
Proposal Details MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR. AN INDUSTRIAL

BUSINESS - TYPE 2 (CHOCOLATE FACTORY WITH
(Use Type, Number of Units/Lots,| INCLUDED RETAIL SHOP) AND ENTERTAINMENT &

 

 

 

 

Retail GFA, Car Parking, etc) DINING BUSINESS - TYPE 1 (CAFE)

PLM Document(s)/Plan(s) Title

Supporting SHEET 01 OF 03, REV D SITE / FLOOR PLAN

Information SHEET 02 OF 03, REV D MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN
; ; SHEET 03 OF 03, REV D NORTH EAST 3D VIEW

(Provided by Applicant)

 

 

 

 

 

This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to an
approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council's policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.

FM6082/8-18/04/2013 Page 1 of 3
Jocument Set ID: 20058719 9
Log in to download the original file

1.3 Prelodgement Meeting.pdf · 1.2 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

 

4. ADVICE & INFORMATION
Planning | Officer Name — Denis Wallace
The proposed chocolate factory component is a consistent use in the Industry zone.

 

 

The restaurant/café use is identified as a consistent use within Noosaville’s Industry zone.
An application will be subject to impact assessment and should demonstrate grounds to
overcome conflicts with the zone provisions, in accordance with S326 of the Sustainable
Planning Act.

Staff are likely to support the café use where it is demonstrated to be integral but ancillary
to a bone fide industrial use on the site. The proposed small retail/café components of the
development appear to meet those criteria and are likely to be supported.

Key elements to be addressed with an application include:

- Provision of sufficient car parking to meet scheme rates and likely demand (based
on staffing numbers and public floor space);

- Demonstrating the business would not create “reverse amenity” impacts on
industrial business in the area based on their potential to create noise and other
emissions that might impinge on the café use.

- Clearly articulated planning grounds to overcome the café use conflict with The
Noosa Plan

Advice was provided regarding calculation of carparking rates based on net use area. Further
detailed designs will allow the final calculation to be made.

Some concerns are raised with manoeuvring and driveway conflicts for vehicles — see
engineering advice below.

Application timeframe is estimated at approximately 3 - 4 months, allowing for public
notification and a report to a Council meeting. Due to the planning scheme conflict, a
decision could not be made by staff delegation but would need to

Please feel free to contact mé on ph. 53296239 to discuss the proposal further.

 

| Officer Name — Mark Lewis

 

The proposed layout is generally acceptable except for some minor issues in regard to
Parking:

- Carspaces 1 & 2 have the potential to conflict with vehicles entering and exiting the
site. If it is possible these spaces should be deleted or as a minimum allocated to staff
to limit the vehicle movements.

- Carspaces 18 & 19 are constrained due to their position and the adjacent loading bay.
These spaces must be allocated for staff only.

- The loading bay must be 12m x 3.6m in accordance with Council's Driveways and
Carparking Code

Please note all carparking must be in accordance with AS/NZS2890. 1:2004

An application should also include a Stormwater Management Plan for the development that
addresses water quality and quantity.

 

 

 

This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council's policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to an
approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council's policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.

FIM6082/8-18/04/2013 Page 2 of 3
Jocument Set ID: 20058719

Page 3

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.