Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

SUPERSEDED NEGOTIATED - OPW25 0042 - REFERENCE DOCUMENT (As Published)

of 180

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (18.6 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 166, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

     Traffic Management Plan – 25040286

          11.            MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND APPROVALS
     The planning of traffic management arrangements has been done with the aims and goals of this TMP in mind. TGS’s will
     meet all requirements as specified in the MUTCD, The Code, TRUMM, TCAS, and company policies and procedures. Refer
     to APPENDIX A for TGS and a Desktop Risk Assessment for the Traffic Guidance Schemes in Appendix A – Traffic
     Guidance Schemes .

     Approvals to carry out the works will be obtained before any work is to commence from the government body
     or bodies, or private entity controlling that particular section of road or road corridor.

          11.1           TMP Review and Improvement

     The process to facilitate continuous improvement will included debrief meetings to discuss any issues or risks
     associated with the plan and a review of the TMP to keep it up to date taking into account changes in traffic
     volumes, vehicle types, the road environment, work practices, standards, and jurisdictionally specific
     legislation.

     A copy of all documentation relating to the endorsement of the changes shall be held on-site by the person
     managing the works.

          11.2           Variations

     Obtain prior approval for variations from the Administrator or the Administrator’s Representative where the
     recommendations of this guide, with respect to levels of service or safety cannot be satisfied.

     Consider the following when contemplating exceptions to this guide:
           • what is the safety performance of the standard arrangement?
           • what is the expected safety performance of the arrangement that incorporates the Exception?
           • what should the safety performance of the temporary traffic arrangement be?
           • is the difference acceptable?


     Should additional TGS be require, it must be submitted at least 14 days prior to the date of the proposed traffic
     rearrangement for approval, and subject to approval.

          11.3           Approvals

     It is the Principal Contractors responsibility to ensure all approvals to carry out the works will be obtained
     before any work is to commence from the government body or bodies, or private entity controlling that
     particular section of road or road corridor.

     Before works commence it is necessary to seek approval from the following:
         • Transport Main Roads QLD (RCP, TCP, etc).
         • Local Government Authority
         • Queensland Police Service
         • Public Transport Authority (where impacting bus routes, level crossing)




Document Set ID: 24005412
                  23806880Document MSF-AT-TMP-001| Issued 05 September 2024| Review: 05 September 2025| Owner: Trevor Leggett | Page: 42
Version: 1,
         0, Version Date: 06/08/2025
                          01/01/1900             [UNCONTROLLED IF WHEN PRINTED AFTER 05 September 2024]
Log in to download the original file

SUPERSEDED NEGOTIATED - OPW25 0042 - REFERENCE DOCUMENT (As Published).pdf · 18.6 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.