Original source · versioned page text
Appendix 9 - Detailed assessment against the Noosa plan
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Division 23—Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Business
Centre Zone
Table 11.19
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Specific Outcomes Probable solutions Detail response
11.31 Consistent uses
O74 The following defined uses and use classes are No solution provided Complies
consistent uses and are located in the Business Centre The proposal is explicitly
Zone— anticipated by the planning
a) Commercial business; scheme and designated as a
b) Entertainment and dining business if not code assessable consistent
located in the Mary Street/Thomas Street use in the Business centre
Precinct; zone when on Lot 1 on
c) Retail business if not located in the Mary RP131598, which is most of
Street/Thomas Street Precinct; the proposed site. Although
d) Education Types 3 or 4; the use is an inconsistent
use when in the Mary
e) Wellbeing Type 2;
Street/Thomas Street
f) Transport Types 1 or 2; precinct, most of the site is
g) Ancillary dwelling unit; not in the precinct. Any
h) Multiple housing Type 4 consisting of small incongruity or incompatibility
dwelling units and part of a mixed use of uses would therefore be
development located within the Mary less pronounced. Lot 21 on
Street/Thomas Street Precinct; and RP72829 already has
i) Visitor accommodation Type 4 if visitor hostel, existing use rights for a
located on Lots 3 & 4 on RP122928, 14-16 Mary Retail business—Type 5
Street. vehicle uses, which is an
inconsistent use. It would
therefore be appropriate for
Council to treat Lot 21 on
RP72829 as if it were not in
the Mary Street/Thomas
Street precinct for this
purpose of this application—
the proposal would not
offend the purpose of
intention of the precinct and
incorporates significant
improvements to amenity on
the boundaries,
11.32 Inconsistent uses
O75 The following defined uses and use classes No solution provided As above.
are inconsistent uses and are not located in the Lot 21 on RP72829 already
Business Centre Zone— has an existing lawful use
a) All Agricultural Uses; right, therefore the proposal
b) Entertainment & dining businesses located in to change the use from one
the Mary Street/Thomas Street Precinct non-conforming use to
c) Home-based businesses; another non-conforming use
d) Industrial business; is not anathema to good
town planning principles,
e) Retail businesses located in the Mary
particularly when both uses
Street/Thomas Street Precinct;
display similar characteristics
f) Education Types 1 or 2;
g) Emergency service;
h) Open space;
i) Wellbeing Types 1, 3 or 4;
j) Service and utility;
k) Transport Types 3 or 4;
l) Detached house;
m) Community residence;
n) Multiple housing if not Type 4 consisting of small
dwelling units located within the Mary Street/Thomas
Street Precinct;
o) Visitor accommodation Types 1, 2 or 3;
Part 11 – Noosaville Locality Plan (The Noosa Plan) Page 9 of 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.