Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix 9 - Detailed assessment against the Noosa plan

of 40

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
 Division 23—Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions for the Business
                             Centre Zone
Table 11.19
                          Column 1                                      Column 2                  Column 3
                      Specific Outcomes                             Probable solutions         Detail response
 11.31 Consistent uses
 O74 The following defined uses and use classes are            No solution provided      Complies
 consistent uses and are located in the Business Centre                                  The proposal is explicitly
 Zone—                                                                                   anticipated by the planning
 a) Commercial business;                                                                 scheme and designated as a
 b) Entertainment and dining business if not                                             code assessable consistent
      located in the Mary Street/Thomas Street                                           use in the Business centre
      Precinct;                                                                          zone when on Lot 1 on
 c) Retail business if not located in the Mary                                           RP131598, which is most of
      Street/Thomas Street Precinct;                                                     the proposed site. Although
 d) Education Types 3 or 4;                                                              the use is an inconsistent
                                                                                         use when in the Mary
 e) Wellbeing Type 2;
                                                                                         Street/Thomas Street
 f) Transport Types 1 or 2;                                                              precinct, most of the site is
 g) Ancillary dwelling unit;                                                             not in the precinct. Any
 h) Multiple housing Type 4 consisting of small                                          incongruity or incompatibility
      dwelling units and part of a mixed use                                             of uses would therefore be
      development located within the Mary                                                less pronounced. Lot 21 on
      Street/Thomas Street Precinct; and                                                 RP72829 already has
 i)   Visitor accommodation Type 4 if visitor hostel,                                    existing use rights for a
      located on Lots 3 & 4 on RP122928, 14-16 Mary                                      Retail business—Type 5
      Street.                                                                            vehicle uses, which is an
                                                                                         inconsistent use. It would
                                                                                         therefore be appropriate for
                                                                                         Council to treat Lot 21 on
                                                                                         RP72829 as if it were not in
                                                                                         the Mary Street/Thomas
                                                                                         Street precinct for this
                                                                                         purpose of this application—
                                                                                         the proposal would not
                                                                                         offend the purpose of
                                                                                         intention of the precinct and
                                                                                         incorporates significant
                                                                                         improvements to amenity on
                                                                                         the boundaries,
 11.32 Inconsistent uses
  O75 The following defined uses and use classes               No solution provided      As above.
  are inconsistent uses and are not located in the                                       Lot 21 on RP72829 already
  Business Centre Zone—                                                                  has an existing lawful use
 a) All Agricultural Uses;                                                               right, therefore the proposal
 b) Entertainment & dining businesses located in                                         to change the use from one
        the Mary Street/Thomas Street Precinct                                           non-conforming use to
 c) Home-based businesses;                                                               another non-conforming use
 d) Industrial business;                                                                 is not anathema to good
                                                                                         town planning principles,
 e) Retail businesses located in the Mary
                                                                                         particularly when both uses
        Street/Thomas Street Precinct;
                                                                                         display similar characteristics
 f)     Education Types 1 or 2;
 g) Emergency service;
 h) Open space;
 i)     Wellbeing Types 1, 3 or 4;
 j)     Service and utility;
 k) Transport Types 3 or 4;
 l)     Detached house;
 m) Community residence;
 n) Multiple housing if not Type 4 consisting of small
        dwelling units located within the Mary Street/Thomas
        Street Precinct;
 o) Visitor accommodation Types 1, 2 or 3;


Part 11 – Noosaville Locality Plan (The Noosa Plan)                                                            Page 9 of 12
Log in to download the original file

Appendix 9 - Detailed assessment against the Noosa plan.pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.