Council archive · source document
08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1128
Very large file (18.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Page 2 As such, the Central Facilities and Apartment buildings along the western portion of the site exceed the building height of 8 metres as they are elevated above natural ground level to enable pedestrian and wheelchair mobility across the site from east to west. The buildings remain 2 storeys of useable floor area but may appear as three storeys from the western-most elevation point. This is clearly evident on the drawing by smithttracey architects Site Cross Section A plan no. DA ADD44 which shows this occurrence on both buildings. To minimise the impact of this, landscaping of the lower level areas is proposed and at no point does the building height appear out of keeping with surrounding development and vegetation. It is not expected that the height of the buildings in these areas will cause any significant impacts on the visual amenity or privacy of others as a result. The overriding need to provide at grade mobility is essential in a development such as this and the benefits of this attribute far outweighs any minor negative impacts of having buildings partially over 8 metres high. 6. Refer to roof plans in the attached addendum of plans prepared by smith+tracey architects. The roof pitch exceeds 5 degrees throughout the development with exception of the suspended concrete roof deck to RAC supporting plant and LMR. Roof overhangs apply to greater than 75% of all buildings. Bullding Setbacks 7. The ILU villas are set back at least 6 metres from the northern (front) property boundary facing Grasstree Court. The ILU apartment 4 building is set back a minimum of 3.65 metres from the adjacent northern (side) boundary. These both comply with Schedule 1 minimum boundary setbacks for development in a Community Services Zone. Apartment building 4 Is also set back a minimum of 0.65 metres from the proposed 3 metre wide access easement. 8. Refer to Master Plan Building Setback Plan no. DA_ADD42 prepared by smith+tracey architects Site Cover 9. Please refer to the s+t Site Cover Calculations Plan no. DA ADD46 showing a site cover of 40% for lot 6 (RAC) and 32% for lot 9 (Retirement Village). Landscaping 10. Please refer to the st+t Landscaping Calculations Plan no. DA ADD 45 showing the relevant soft and hard landscaping areas and respective percentages.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 18.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.