08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1128

Page 4

13.6 Car spaces have been numbered on all basement plans and a coloured
Parking Calculations plan is provided which clearly defines the proposed
uses.

14. The car parking allocations for staff at the RAC building has been
revised as shown on plan DA_11/P1 by smith+ttracey architects.

Biodiversity

15 — 18 Refer to attached letter and attachments by Place dated 25"
November 2008 responding to these items.

 

 

 

 

 

 

19. The estimated nutrient loads are as follows:
Post- Load based
Pre- Post- .
developed, reduction
developed developed mitigated (%)
Flow
(ML/year) 24.9 46.6 32.5 30.3
TSS (kg/yr) | 5860 4520 893 80.2
TP (kg/yr) 619 12 4.23 64.8
TN (kg/yr) 46.2 95.8 40.2 58.0
GP (kg/yr) 94.1 1030 4.34 99.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The load based target reductions for TSS (80%), TP (60%) and TN (45%),
are achieved. The increase in mean annual runoff volume is not considered
to be detrimental to the local environs.

20. The impact of the proposed development, including earthworks, to
onsite and offsite hydrology is essentially addressed in current report.

Bushfire

21. Please refer to attached fetter and map of development from
LandGraphics showing fire break and fire trail locations.

22. Please refer to attached letter from LandGraphics in response to this
point regarding Queensland Fire and Rescue Service requirements.

Cultural Heritage

23. A search of the subject site for artefacts of cultural and heritage
significance was conducted in April 2008 and a shell midden has been
identified on existing lot 1 approximately 1km west of the subject site (refer to
attached email and aerial photo dated 23 April 2008).

Land Development

Rainwater Tanks

24. Rainwater tanks were sized in accordance with the Noosa Planning
Scheme Policy 22 — Water Tanks.

Gut