Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Council archive · source document

08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1128

of 116

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (18.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Page 7

From Table 2.10 of the Engineering Report:

Peak 100 year ARI discharge from southern basin is 0.28 m/s, which
gives velocity = 0.09 m/s.

Peak 100 year ARI discharge from northern basin is 0.05 m/s, which
gives velocity = 0.017 mis.

The model was reviewed. The model indicated that the peak velocity in the
southern basin would be 0.135 m/s and the peak velocity from the northern
basin would be 0.025 m/s.

Scour due to flow velocities is considered to be negligible.

39. It is proposed that grease and oil filtration devices will be installed on
GPTs.

40. All basement car parks, including the RAC basement will drain by
gravity means to the bioretention basins. Refer to attachment for further
details.

41. RAC basement plans now include gated drains to facilitate gravity
feed of stormwater as per item 40 above.

Ecological Impacts

42. It is suggested that single high ARI events (Q1 and above) have
minimal long term ecological impact. The bio-retention basin acts to
attenuate the peak discharges for high ARI events such that flow volume in
equals flow volume out, less minor infiltration or evaporation losses. Refer to
attached letter from Place dated 25"" November 2008.

43. This item has been addressed fully in the attached letter by Place
dated 25'" November 2008.

44. The proposed spreader channels will act to redistribute collected
stormwater in a manner which, as much as possible, emulates the natural
runoff conditions for the site.

45. The proposed pergola (open nature) would not impact on MUSIC
modelling or bio-retention treatment functionality providing adequate light is
allowed for plant requirements. Shade tolerant species may be used as
outlined in the Healthy Waterways Guidelines.

46. The location of the bio-retention basin has been constrained by the
development layout. Construction and vegetation management plans to be
conditioned as part of the Operational Works application.

External Traffic Generation

47 - 52 Please refer to the attached report prepared by Arup addressing
these points.

Gui

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
18.3 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

08_1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published].pdf · 18.3 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.