Council archive · source document
08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published] · 132008.1128
Very large file (18.3 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Page 8 Internal Traffic Generation and Vehicular Access 53. All internal roads have been increased in width to a minimum of 5.5 metres as requested to allow for two way traffic flow. Refer to st+t drawing DA_ADD42 and DA_ADD47 and Arups report. 54. Refer to attached report from Arup. 55, All pathways have been increased to a minimum of 1.5 metres as requested with majority increased to 2 metres wide. Refer to the Building Setbacks and Easement plan no DA_ADD42 by smith+tracey architects. 56. The service bay has been increased to the RAC with revised maneuvering capabilities as shown on the RAC ground floor plan no ADD_ DA11/P1. The service bay to the central! facilities will require service vehicles to back up to the loading bay for ease of loading/unloading. Therefore the exiting from the Central facilities loading bay will be in a forward motion. 57. The bin storage is now indicated on Parking Calculations plan no. DA_ADD47 by smith+tracey architects. Refer also to the attached report by Arup. 58, Road widths have been increased to 5.5 meters. Refer to s+t drawing no DA_ADD42 and Arup’s report. Car Parking 59-63 Refer to the attached report prepared by Arup. 64. The disabled spaces are clearly identified on drawing no. DA_ADD 47 by smith+tracey architects. External Infrastructure Agreements 65. It was agreed in principle at the prelodgement meeting on 14” February 2008 by Council’s engineer and Tracy Jones that it was inappropriate that the road remain, and that it was to be taken out of the site. 66. Not applicable — this will be addressed at Operational Works stage. 67. All pathways have been revised as required with the proposed maximum gradients of 1:20 throughout. 68. Subject to discussions with Council's Water and Sewerage Capital Works Manager, all easements have been clearly identified on the Building Setbacks and Easement plan DA_ADD42 by smith+tracey architects. Sewerage 69. Location of easements is shown. Gin?
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
08/1128 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 18.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.