2017-02-07 Planning and Environment Committee Agenda

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   7 FEBRUARY 2017




                                                     Page 49 of 125

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                                             7 FEBRUARY 2017

                   REPORT

                    ITEM                                                               NOTES

                                          -   a)ii. The proposal creates a potentially unsafe pedestrian condition in the rear podium carpark
                                              and within the basement carpark
                                          -   d) The architectural character of the proposal could be further enhanced and simplified in order to
                                              reinforce the distinct character of the existing residential precinct along Doonella Street, and the
                                              Tewantin town centre.
                    2.2      ~~__|   The stage 1 peer review identified section 6.5 of the town planner's report, entitled ‘Overall Outcomes for
                                    the Tewantin & Doonan Locality” which referenced section 12.8.2 w) i) and ii) of the Noosa Plan:
                                          w)  For the Community Services Zone—land committed or planned for community purposes—
                                                i    is protected and managed to enable the efficient and timely delivery of community services; and
                                              ii.    is consistent with the indoor recreation, education, social and safety needs of the local community, including
                                                     people with special needs, such as the elderly, children, low income earners and disabled persons;
                                     Nra-co-lab comment
                                     It is our view that the proposal scheme is not consistent with item w) ii. with regards to the safety needs of
                                    the local community, including those with special needs.

                   3.                eT agai
                    3.1              General
                                     It was our view in the stage 1 peer review that, with reference to item 079 of Division 22 of ‘Tewantin &
                                     Doonan Locality Plan” the proposed design of the proposed extension did not “relate to the setting and
                                     heritage of the locality”
                                     It is our current view that the response proposal exhibits a vastly improved relationship with the setting
                                     and heritage of the locality - taking on an aesthetic more in tune with the ‘Noosa’ Style. However there
                                     remain some architectural issues which we believe need to be addressed so as to improve the quality of
                                     the aesthetic. This further enhancement of the aesthetic is warranted due to the building's prime location
                                     in the central business area.
                  32              it'd s4stosSs4—S—_
                                     The use of pitched roof forms is appropriate. And the use of lightweight roof edges to the store and
                                     smokers terrace is commendable.
                                     However the roof forms have been configured in an overly complicated manner which has resulted in the
                                     creation of multiple box gutters, which is something that should be avoided. It is recognised that there is a
                                     height limit in effect, but it is questioned whether the applicant can reconfigure the roofs to remove the
                                     need for box gutters. A sketch roof plan has been attached to this peer review with suggestions for
                                     consideration.
                                     It is suggested that the roof forms be further articulated through the addition of pop up roof apexes as per
                                     shown on the attached sketch plans. This would assist in breaking down the size of the roof forms

                   Page 20f 8

                   Y:\86035C16 Tewantin RSL Extension\2.0 Email - Correspondence\2.1 Architect\2.1.09 Reports\1.09.1 Predesign\PF 16 2nd Peer Review Report - Issue A.doc Noel Robinson Architects Pt Ltd
                   Issue...... Created 24 July 2013                                                                                AB

                                                                                                                                    Page 49 of 125