Council archive · source document
09/1654 - Preliminary Building Works Assessable Against the Planning Scheme [As Published] · 172009.1654
IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22
[PLANNING SCHEME ee a et |
vai
41 |s the proposed operational work assessable under any State planning regulatory provisions?
No (] Yes
If no, is the proposed operational work assessable under the planning scheme?
(FJ No - Goto a4.2 Yes - Complete Form 1, Part E and answer Q4.1.1- 4.1.7 below
ISTATE-CONTROLLED ROAD: S 7s
4.1.1" |s any part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road?
No [] Yes
If no, is the proposed operational work for filling or excavating listed in Integrated Planning Regulation 1998,
schedule 5 and does it exceed the threshold?
RX] No - Goto. 04.1.2
| Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
JP Regulation. schedule 2, table 3, item 3: P Regulation, schedule 2. tabie 3. item 4(b)
ACID SULFATE SOILS
4.1.2 Is any of the operatiortal work proposed in a local government area listed*' in State Planning Policy 2/02: Planning and Managing
‘, + Development Involving Acid Sulfate Soils
BK] No -Got0a413 (11 Yes
. 4Taurukun, Bowen, Brisbane, Broadsound, Bundaberg, Burdekin, Burke, Burnett, Caboolture, Cains, Calliope, Caloundra, Cardwell, Carpentaria, Cook, Coolooia, Douglas,
Fitzroy, Gladstone, Gold Coast, Hervey Bay, Hinchinbrook, Isis, Johnstone, Livingstone, Logan, Mackay, Maroochy, Maryborough, Mirium Vale, Momington, Noosa, Pine Rivers,
Redcliffe, Redland, Rockhampton, Sarina, Thuringowa, Tiaro, Torres, Townsville, Whitsunday .
1 Regulation, schedule 2, table 2, item 4: State Planning Po!
|EASEMENTS AND SUBSTATIONS
icy 2:02: Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sutfate Sails, section 38
4.1.3 |s any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?
ER] No - Go 1004.14 :
[J Yes
JP Requiation, schedule 2, tabie 3 fa); IP Regulation, schedule 2, table 3, item 10fb)
4.1.4
|s any part of the premises subject to an easement in favour of the holder of Pipeline Licence Number 1 issued under the
Petroleum Act 1923 for the construction or operation of t
he Moonie to Brisbane strategic pipeline under that Act?
No -Goto04.1.5 [[] Yes .
IP Regulation, schedule 2. table 3. item 17
(PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT:
415
|s any of the proposed operational work listed in schedule 1 s it exceed the
3C of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and doe
specified threshold?
No- Go to 04.1.6 Oo Yes - This application must be referred to QueenslandTransp
ort (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
iP Regulation, schedule 2, fable 3, item 14
|RAILWAY SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY * ~~ Por ‘ : . : . : }
4.1.6 Is any of the proposed operational work listed in schedule 13D of the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998 and does it exceed the
specified threshold?
OX] No- Go to 04.1.7
iP Regulation, schedule 2.
Cl Yes - This application must be referred to QueensiandTransport (QT) as Concurrence Agency.
e3. item 18
(KOALA CONSERVATION (outside SEQ urban footprint) oe
447
4s any part of the premises in'a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area, other than in an SEQ urban footprint area?
EX] No -Gotoas2 [-] Yes ,
{P Regulation, schedule 2, table 3. item 19
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
09/1654 - Preliminary Building Works Assessable Against the Planning Scheme [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.0 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.