05. Town Planning Report · MCU10/2127

         4. Scenario Analysis
Occupancy Rate Matrix - Guest and Owner Nights                                                                                                                                    Table 4.3
Guest Nights Total                                                                               Owner Occupiers
          Occ. Rates       0%       5%    10%       15%      20%      25%      30%      35%      40%    45%      50%      55%      60%      65%      70%      75%      80%      85%      90%
                    0%    -      2,334  4,667     7,001    9,334   11,668   14,001   16,335   18,668 21,002 23,335     25,669   28,002   30,336   32,669   35,003   37,337   39,670   42,004
                    5%  2,699    5,033  7,366     9,700   12,033   14,367   16,700   19,034   21,367 23,701 26,034     28,368   30,701   33,035   35,369   37,702   40,036   42,369       -
    V
                   10%  5,398    7,732 10,065    12,399   14,732   17,066   19,399   21,733   24,066 26,400 28,733     31,067   33,400   35,734   38,068   40,401   42,735       -        -
    i
                   15%  8,097 10,431 12,764      15,098   17,431   19,765   22,098   24,432   26,765 29,099 31,432     33,766   36,099   38,433   40,767   43,100       -        -        -
    s
                   20% 10,796 13,130 15,463      17,797   20,130   22,464   24,797   27,131   29,464 31,798 34,131     36,465   38,799   41,132   43,466       -        -        -        -
    i
                   25% 13,495 15,829 18,162      20,496   22,829   25,163   27,496   29,830   32,163 34,497 36,830     39,164   41,498   43,831       -        -        -        -        -
    t
                   30% 16,194 18,528 20,861      23,195   25,528   27,862   30,195   32,529   34,862 37,196 39,530     41,863   44,197       -        -        -        -        -        -
    o
                   35% 18,893 21,227 23,560      25,894   28,227   30,561   32,894   35,228   37,561 39,895 42,229     44,562       -        -        -        -        -        -        -
    r
                   40% 21,592 23,926 26,259      28,593   30,926   33,260   35,593   37,927   40,260 42,594 44,928         -        -        -        -        -        -        -        -
    s
                   45% 24,291 26,625 28,958      31,292   33,625   35,959   38,292   40,626   42,960 45,293       -        -        -        -        -        -        -        -        -
                   50% 26,990 29,324 31,657      33,991   36,324   38,658   40,991   43,325   45,659     -        -        -        -        -        -        -        -        -        -
Source: Urb is

    This shows, for example, that the maximum occupancy situation, assuming a 50% occupancy rate cap for visitors and a 90% occupancy rate
    cap overall, yields a total of 45,659 visitor/owner nights that could theoretically be accommodated within the subject development proposal.
    This is highly unlikely and a more realistic maximum would be 36,324 visitor/owner nights based on a:

    ƒ 20% occupancy rate
                      t ffor owners; and
                                       da
    ƒ 50% occupancy rate for visitors.




                                                                                                                                                                             27


[OCR of page images]
 

4. Scenario Analysis

Occupancy Rate Matrix - Guest and Owner Nights Table 4.3

   

|Guest Nights Total Owner Occupiers
Occ. Rates 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90%
: 2,334 4,667 7,001 9,334 11,668 14,001 16,335 18,668 21,002 23,335 25,669 28,002 30,336 32,669 35,003 37,337 39,670 42,004
5%! 2,699 5,033 7,366 9,700] 12,033] 14,367] 16,700] 19,034] 21,367] 23,701] 26,034 | 28,368] 30,701] 33,035] 35,369} 37,702| 40,036} 42,369 -
10%] 5,398 7,732 | 10,065 | 12,399] 14,732] 17,066] 19,399] 21,733] 24,066] 26,400] 28,733] 31,067| 33,400} 35,734] 38,068] 40,401) 42,735 - -
15%] 8,097] 10,431) 12,764] 15,098} 17,431] 19,765] 22,098) 24,432] 26,765] 29,099] 31,432 | 33,766 | 36,099} 38,433] 40,767] 43,100 - - -
20%} 10,796 | 13,130] 15,463) 17,797] 20,130] 22,464] 24,797| 27,131 | 29,464] 31,798] 34,131) 36,465] 38,799] 41,132} 43,466 - - - -
25%] 13,495| 15,829] 18,162] 20,496] 22,829] 25,163] 27,496 | 29,830} 32,163] 34,497] 36,830) 39,164] 41,498] 43,831 - - - - -
30%] 16,194] 18,528 | 20,861) 23,195] 25,528] 27,862] 30,195 | 32,529} 34,862] 37,196] 39,530] 41,863) 44,197 - - - - - -
35%] 18,893] 21,227 | 23,560] 25,894] 28,227] 30,561} 32,894| 35,228} 37,561] 39,895] 42,229) 44,562 - - - - - - -
40%] 21,592 | 23,926 | 26,259) 28,593] 30,926] 33,260} 35,593 | 37,927} 40,260} 42,594] 44,928 - - - - - - - -
45%] 24,291] 26,625 | 28,958) 31,292] 33,625] 35,959} 38,292| 40,626| 42,960] 45,293 - - - - - - - - -
50%} 26,990 | 29,324 | 31,657 | 33,991 | 36,324] 38,658} 40,991 | 43,325] 45,659 : : : : : : : : : :

                                     

 

 

en eed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Urbis

This shows, for example, that the maximum occupancy situation, assuming a 50% occupancy rate cap for visitors and a 90% occupancy rate
cap overall, yields a total of 45,659 visitor/owner nights that could theoretically be accommodated within the subject development proposal.
This is highly unlikely and a more realistic maximum would be 36,324 visitor/owner nights based on a:

= 20% occupancy rate for owners; anda
= 50% occupancy rate for visitors.

 

ga Urbis