Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Council archive · source document

07/0070 - Representation in response to following conditions [As Published] · 132007.70

of 2

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

 

Your Reference: 2007/70
Our Reference: 00610 L12 NG

martoo

22 AUG 2007 onsultingo
47 August 2007 sik COUNCIL pty It

town planners +
urban designers

 

 

Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
P.O. Box 141
TEWANTIN Q 4565

Attention: Land Use Section - Dennis Wallace

Dear Sir

RE: Application for a Development Approval for a Material Change of Use and Lot
Reconfiguration for Boundary Realignment & 2 Detached Houses situated at 14
Little Cove Road, Noosa Heads described as Lots 1 & 4 RP108495 and Lot 48
RP52918

| refer to Council's Decision Notice dated 5th July 2007 (and received by this office ai” July) in
respect to the above development application and to our letter dated 19th July 2007 which advised
Council that the applicant has decided to suspend the appeal period in order to make
representations about certain conditions in accordance with Section 3.5.18(1) of the integrated
Planning Act 1997.

This letter provides representations in response the following conditions:
Conditions numbered — 37, 43 and 67

This submission quotes those conditions to be amended, provides representations to all of the
above conditions and suggests the way in which the decision notice can be changed in order to
respond to the applicant's current concems.

Condition 37: A shared visitor car space shail be incorporated on the easter side of the
driveway, clear of ail necessary maneuvering areas (required to gain access to
the garages on Lots 1 & 2), for use by both Lots 1 and 2 and their visitors. The
visitor car space shall be in a highly visible location and shall be suitably
signposted and line marked. The type and extent of the signposting and line
marking shall be clearly shown on all plans submitted for a Development Permit
for Operational Works.

Condition 43: —_A registered easement shall be created over the shared visitor carspace. The
terms of the easement shall include:

i, That the shared visitor carspace be for use by both lots 1 &2,

i, That the shared visitor carspace not be restricted by gates, security
screens or other obstructions, and

iii. That it is the responsibility of the beneficiaries of the easement to
maintain the shared visitor carspace so as to be operational at all times.

Representation to Condition 37 and 43: The applicant requests that the conditions be deleted
as it is not a reasonable or relevant condition. The applicant has applied for a reconfiguration of a

SUNSHINE COAST OFFICE GYMPIE OFFICE
1/199 GYMPIE TERRACE NOOSAVILLE - PO BOX 1684 NOOSA HEADS Q 4567 1/28 REEF STREET GYMPIE - PO BOX 391 GYMPIE Q 4570
TELEPHONE 07 54555425 - FACSIMILE 07 54555725 TELEPHONE 07 54827440 - FACSIMILE 07 54824952

[email protected] [email protected]
Full text of the other 1 page

Page 2

Page 2

lot which is code assessable development and two detached dwellings which are also code
assessable development due to the Biodiversity overlay across the site.

It is noted that the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code and the Biodiversity Code do not require the
provision of a visitor carparking space for detached houses. Further it is noted that the Probable
Solutions of the Detached house Code ($25.1) indicates that only one carparking spaces is
tequired to be provided on site. The proposal complies with the probable solution and provides
well in excess of the required two spaces for the development by the provision of two double
garages which provides carparking for four spaces on the site. Therefore the requirement for the
visitor carparking space is not warranted or required by the planning scheme.

The applicant is also concemed about the loss of vegetation that would be required as a result of
construction of the visitor space.

Amended Condition 37 and 43: The applicant requests that Council delete conditions 37 and 43.

Condition 67: A registered easement in favour of Council shall be created over any
overland flow path within the site that conveys stormwater from a Council
road. The easement shall extend the full length and width of the ‘1 in 100
year major storm event surface flow path and be created at no cost to
Council.

Condition 68. A registered easement in favour of Council shall be created over any
Stormwater drainage pipes within the site that convey stormwater from
any adjoining property (for example, where drainage pipes are provided
within the site to prevent adjacent properties from additional
ponding/iooding due to the subject site being filled). The easement is to
be centrally located over the pipework with a minimum width of 1.5m or
be of sufficient width to ensure all associated pits and pipes are wholly
contained within the easement. The terms of the easement shail include
the responsibilities on the beneficiaries of the easement to maintain the
drain so as to be operational — at all times.

Representation to Conditions 67 and 68:

The applicant is concerned about the implications of these conditions on the development. The
applicant has not yet commenced final drawings for the development and is concemed that the
conditions may be quite onerous and severely impact on the overall design of the buildings. Further
the implications of this condition on stormwater requires extensive engineering consideration and
design which would be more appropriately dealt with as part of any application for operational
works. The applicants designer therefore requests that the conditions be deleted from the
Reconfiguration of a Lot approvals and be incorporated into any Operational Works application.

Amended Condition 67 and 68: ‘delete’
The applicants therefore request that Council issues a negotiated decision notice which amends
the original conditions as suggested above.

Please do not hesitate in contacting our office if Council requires any further information.

Yours faithfully

INC OLe~.

Nadine Gorton
Senior Planner
Martoo Consulting Pty Ltd

Used in these records

About this file

File size
119 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_0070 - Representation in response to following conditions [As Published].pdf · 119 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.