Original source · versioned page text
Annex 13 - Schedule 3 - Prescribed Tidal Works
Attached to the e-mail DA Application - Noosa Oyster Project (2 of 3).
Coastal Protection and Management Regulation 2017
Schedule 3. Code for Assessable Development that is prescribed tidal works
Part 3 Performance outcomes and acceptable outcomes
Public access - availability
8.1 Prescribed tidal works do not have a The design and construction of the prescribed tidal works is Complies with Performance Outcome 8.1
significant adverse effect on the availability of consistent with the following standards—
public access to, along or across State coastal (a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed tidal works do not The design provides for a minimum distance of 10m
land. involve the erection or placement of any physical barrier from foreshore access to maintain public use of and
preventing existing public access to, along or across State access to and along state coastal land. Refer ICM
coastal land near the works; drawing NROR-2021-00.
(b) if a relevant planning scheme standard is more stringent At the Tewantin site (ICM drawing NROR-2021-04)
than the standard mentioned in paragraph (a)—the relevant upstream of the boat ramp, there is an opening in the
planning scheme standard, to the extent it is more stringent than vegetation that could provide public access to the
the standard mentioned in paragraph (a); structure if desirable. In this location a wider 4m
access gap has been provided between shoreward
(c) any other relevant planning scheme standard that is not
reef patches to facilitate safe access by a larger
inconsistent with the standards mentioned in paragraphs (a) and
number of persons if this was desirable (e.g. for
(b).
education purposes).
Public access - safety
9.1 The location and design of prescribed Public access to State coastal land near the prescribed tidal Complies with Performance Outcome 9.1
tidal works does not adversely affect the works is consistent with each relevant planning scheme
safety of members of the public accessing standard. Members of the public could approach by vessel or
State coastal land. from land (for some sites). There are gaps between
the reef patches at the seabed and this would allow
persons to transit between the reef patches.
The design includes
- Crest level at Mean High Water Springs will result
in the works being exposed at most tides,
although some settlement is expected initially
which may result in lowering of crest levels.
- Provision of a navigation buoy and signage at
each site to reduce the risk of vessel collision with
the works, impacts from anchoring and warn
against consuming oysters from the works.
- Gaps between reef patches to be 1-4m wide to
allow for careful transit of monitoring personnel
and public. This gap widens at water level due to
batter slopes. A wider gap (minimum 4m) is
provided where land-based access is viable and
7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.