Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Council archive · source document

Development Application part 3 of 10 Planning Report - MCU13/0092

of 59

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (41.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

                                  .
                                  ~~
                                 ’.’i"J ;(tliJ:;I
                                  1NTE6IIfTV.fXClUfNCE’5I.JCCESS




                                                   function of the David Low                                   Way will
                                                   be maintained in accordance with
                                                   the findings of a Traffic Assessment by
                                                    PTT Consulting.
Element 7.10 Built Form                             11 m           if used for         an       indoor
                                                                                                     sporting
Height 04                                          complex                  in        the       Open  Space
                                                   Recreation zone, otherwise 8m.
                                                   Comments:                     the       proposal            will   not
                                                   exceed 8 metres.
Setbacks 05                                        As              per    schedule              1        -
                                                                                                              Minimum
                                                   Boundary Setbacks, namely 10metres
                                                   for frontages and to any residential
                                                   zone, otherwise 3 metres.
                                                   Comments: Schedule                                1       requires   a

                                                    10m set-back to Rufous Street as Lot
                                                   94 does not have                    frontage to the
                                                                                            a

                                                   David                 Low      Way. The proposed
                                                   Complex                 will       be    set      back        about
                                                   30metres (minimum) from the David
                                                   Low  Way due to the Community
                                                   Centre Car Park allotment being
                                                   between the site and that Road. The
                                                   building              has      a    minimum               alignment
                                                   set-back of about 6 metres to Rufous
                                                   Street           ,
                                                                         however, in practical terms,
                                                   due to a variable width street reserve
                                                   for Rufous Street thebuilding is set
                                                   back              about  (minimum) 15metres
                                                   from the edge of carriageway at its
                                                   northern end and about 24 metres at
                                                   its southern                  end. As there                  are     no

                                                   residential properties in Rufous Street,
                                                   and it carries only destination traffic
                                                   to the Tennis Complex and                                          the
                                                   Community Vegetable Garden.

                                                   In respect of the Specific Outcomes
                                                   It      is      considered              that the            proposal
                                                   does not undermine the amenity for
                                                   users           of the premise, the neighbours
                                                   north            of     Woodland                 Drive,      or    the
                                                   general public visiting the tennis
                                                   complex    or   the     Community
                                                   Vegetable Garden. The existing
                                                   informal verge in Rufous Street has
                                                   ample space for landscaping and


May 2013                  IA MCU IGA Complex at Peregian                                                         Page 38

Used in these records

About this file

File size
41.5 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Development Application part 3 of 10 Planning Report - MCU13_0092.pdf · 41.5 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.