Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Council archive · source document

Development Application part 3 of 10 Planning Report - MCU13/0092

of 59

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (41.5 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.

                                   .
                                    ~~
                                   "’lift;J’l.):;a
                                    NTEGIIfTV.EXCtlL(N((.SIJCCESS




                                                     retention              of the       existing generally
                                                     ’open’                character        along    Rufous
                                                     street.
Site cover, gross floor area and    plot             No solution provided
ratio 06                                             Comments: It is considered that the
                                                     proposal complies with 06 a) to e)
Flooding and drainage 011                            Comments: The site is                     above any
                                                     Flood Plain, and drainage has been
                                                     addressed               by i3 Consulting       -
                                                                                                        refer to
                                                     Attachment D.
Roof Form 012                                        Comments: The                   proposal complies
                                                    with S 12.2 but is in conflict with S 12.1
                                                     and                sub-clause       (d)   of   Specific
                                                     Outcome 012
7.11 Environment, Conservation and                   No solution provided
Recreation                                           Comments: Full compliance with 015
Environmental and cultural    heritage               a) to i) inclusive is proposed.
values 015

Open Space network 016                              Comments:            proposal    will
                                                                                   the
                                                     enhance the public access through
                                                     the site compared with the previous
                                                     abandoned use as a Bowls Club.
Pedestrian and bicycle pathways                      Pedestrian access will be                  potentially
                                                     available from the David Low Way &
                                                     Rufous Street                 and     Bicycle parking
                                                    facilities will be provided on-site.
Aircraft Safety                                      As with neighbouring development
                                                     of                  similar
                                                                   height no adverse
                                                                    a

                                                     impacts on the operation of aircraft
                                                    will arise.


In summary it is considered that the proposal generally satisfies all relevant

Specific Outcomes of the eastern Beaches Locality Code, with very few
exceptions and any non compliance is deemed low level or minor.

In relation to the conflict with 012 the                      following comments are offered,
namely:
    1. The    design is not dissimilar to the skyline outcome of the adjoining
        "Marquesas" which appears to have a similar roof pitch to that
        proposed by the proposal, whilst the Marquesas building is some
        200mm higher;
   2.   It is difficult to image that any member of the general public either
        driving or walking past the site would know what the roof pitch was
        and certainly would not be able to discern the difference between a
        30 and 50 Roof pitch. A comparison with the streetscape of the
        Peregian Beach Tavern building rooflines would seem to further

May 2013                    IA MCU IGA Complex at Peregian                                               Page 39

Used in these records

About this file

File size
41.5 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Development Application part 3 of 10 Planning Report - MCU13_0092.pdf · 41.5 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.