Original source · versioned page text
AU213016247 - Change Representations during Appeal Period (MCU25-0118)
Our ref: AU213016247 Comment As well as showing the new infrastructure requirements described above, the amended Landscape Concept Package provided at Appendix B has also been updated to include additional large trees to the boundaries, where there is adequate spatial allowance. While provision of additional large trees can be readily accommodated along the northern boundary, providing large trees along the eastern and western boundaries is more challenging. In this regard, the DDA-compliant ramp in the site’s south-eastern corner does not afford room for any additional large trees, as such no changes have been made in this location. Feature trees placed at 5m centres have been introduced in the north-easter corner, ensuring the appearance of the fire hydrant pump room is softened, as depicted in Figure 2 above and Figure 3 below. It is also suggested that Coast2Bay could contribute to the provision of trees along the boundary interface with the adjoining bioretention basin. Figure 3 – Additional planting in north-eastern corner In terms of the western boundary, given the availability of 1.2m between the boundary fence and the retaining wall located adjacent to Unit 07, it is not considered suitable to provide large trees along this interface. Rather, Project Urban has recommended the use of medium size columnar trees in this location, as depicted in Figure 4 below. RPS AAP Consulting Pty Ltd. Registered in Australia No. 97 117 883 173 rpsgroup.com Page 4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original