Original source · versioned page text
Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses
LANDSCAPING CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
(c) clearly set apart for private use and area of 25m2 exclusive of the clothes
separate from communal areas; drying area, with minimum
(d) directly accessible from a living area dimensions of 4m and maximum
of the unit; gradient of 10% (1:10); or
(e) located away from noise generating (b) for units above ground level, a
uses; minimum area of 12m2, with minimum
(f) capable of receiving adequate dimensions of 2.5m; and
sunlight; and S10.2 For Multiple housing Types 2 and
(g) designed to provide for the privacy of 4, the private open space area is
occupants of the premises and enclosed by side and rear fencing,
adjoining premises. screening or dense landscaping of at least
1.8m in height to protect the privacy of
residents; or
S10.3 For Visitor Accommodation no
solution provided.
Communal open space
O11 Communal open space within the No solution provided.
development provides adequate area for
children to play and for socialising, and
preferably has a northern aspect.
Screening & Mounding
O12 Planting is provided between units, No solution provided.
adjacent to service and car parking areas
and around the boundary of the site to
provide for adequate screening. (see
Figure 14-20).
O13 Clothes drying areas and waste
disposal areas are screened from
adjoining properties and road frontages.
Figure 14-20
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
A/S = Alternative Solution Cooroy Care Farm
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008 Page 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.