Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses

of 88

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                                                                         LANDSCAPING CODE
                                                                                                                 Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions



                                                       PROBABLE SOLUTIONS                                                                     COUNCIL USE
       PERFORMANCE CRITERIA                                                   SOLUTIONS*                    COMMENTS
                                                       (IF CODE ASSESSABLE)                                                                      ONLY




O14 Mounding adjacent to units do not
extend into service corridors, cover utility
covers, obstruct overland stormwater flow,
or cause ponding on footpaths, verges or
on adjoining private property.
O15 Mounding associated with noise
barriers is designed to avoid linear shapes
and incorporates undulating shapes and
forms that vary in height and width.
Streetscape character
O16 Landscaping complements and                No solution provided.
enhances      the    existing    streetscape
character by providing plantings that
match the scale of buildings within the
street. (see Figure 14-21 and Figure 14-
22).
O17 Where a podium is provided, planting
is established on the podium to soften the
bulk and appearance of the building, and
species are used that can tolerate difficult
climatic conditions.

Figure 14-21 Lack of integration with
street, unsuited to scale of buildings



1    Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
               A/S = Alternative Solution                                                                                                    Cooroy Care Farm
               N/A = Not applicable to this proposal

521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain                               Commenced 3 February 2006 – Amended 3 March 2008                  Page 8
Log in to download the original file

Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses.pdf · 1.9 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.