Original source · versioned page text
Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses
WASTE MANAGEMENT CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PROBABLE SOLUTIONS COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
(IF CODE ASSESSABLE) ONLY
(b) have unobstructed access for the
collection of the waste by service
vehicles;
(c) provide for sufficient space for safe
entry and exit and servicing by
Council’s contractor without the need
for manual handling;
(d) are clear of carparking bays, loading
bays and similar areas;
(e) are clear of footpaths and pedestrian
access;
(f) are capable of being serviced by the
collection vehicle without impeding
traffic flow; and
(g) have a level area provided for the
storage of waste and recyclable
materials in standard waste
containers; and
S3.3 ✓ S3.3 Complies
For uses that do not comprise a Waste storage areas comply.
caretaker’s residence or central
management, the maximum distance
between waste storage areas and the
kerbside is—
(a) for Multiple housing Type 3 – 40m;
(b) for other uses – 70m; and S3.4
Pathways used to transport bins—
S3.4 ✓ S3.4 Complies
Pathways used to transport bins— The proposal’s pathways comply.
(a) have a maximum grade of 1:15; and
(b) are free of steps, stairs or other
impediments; and
O4 S4.1 ✓ S2.1 Complies
The location and methods of waste Waste storage areas are— Waste storage areas will allow for separate storage of
storage minimises any adverse impacts on (a) integrated with the building design, different waste materials.
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
A/S = Alternative Solution Cooroy Care Farm
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain Commenced 3rd February 2006 - Updated October 2006 Page 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.