Original source · versioned page text
Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses
BIODIVERSITY OVERLAY CODE
Specific Outcomes and Probable Solutions
COMMENTS COUNCIL USE
SPECIFIC OUTCOMES PROBABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS*
ONLY
Vegetation retention and conservation
Environmental Protection Area & Environmental Enhancement Area Vegetation & Riparian Buffer Area
O1 Vegetation of local origin local origin8 on S1.1 An Ecological Assessment Report ✓ Complies with O1
premises identified as— prepared in accordance with
Planning Scheme Policy 18 – A bushfire hazard report has been prepared, which
a) Environmental Protection Area9 or Riparian Ecological Assessment Guidelines describes the vegetation located on-site. The
Buffer Area on the Biodiversity Overlay demonstrates that the flora on the development has also been sited to avoid significant
Maps OM1.1 to OM9.1, is retained and premises does not constitute vegetation.
conserved in its present form or improved to Environmental Protection Area or
ensure its ongoing contribution to the Environmental Enhancement Area
natural resources and biological diversity of vegetation.11
the former Noosa Shire; and
OR
b) Environmental Enhancement Area10 on
Biodiversity Overlay Maps OM1.1 – OM9.1,
is protected from the impacts of S1.2 Where constructing a Detached
development by— House; or Community residence
interference with vegetation does
i. avoiding edge effects; not extend beyond—
ii. avoiding fragmentation; and a) 30m of a building or 10m of a
structure on lots greater than
iii. maintaining vegetation in manageable 10ha; or
and viable configurations.
b) 10m of a building or structure
AND on lots 10ha or less but more
than 0.3ha; or
c) 3m of a building or structure on
lots 0.3ha or less.
O2 For the purpose of Reconfiguring a Lot new S2.1 Where interference with vegetation N/A Not Applicable
lots are only created where they minimize the on the premises is for the purpose
fragmentation and maximise the retention of of Reconfiguring a Lot— The proposed development is not for reconfiguring a
existing vegetation. lot.
a) new boundaries to lots do not
transect and fragment existing
vegetation;
Solution: ✓ Acceptable Solution Amended by Council: August 2011
A/S Alternative Solution Current as at: August 2012
N/A Not applicable to this proposal
Page 1 of 11
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.