Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses

of 88

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                                                                 NATURAL HAZARDS OVERLAY CODE
                                                                                                                         Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions



                                                                                                                                                       COUNCIL      USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA                         ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS                       SOLUTIONS*   COMMENTS
                                                                                                                                                       ONLY
O12 Roads provide for the safe and           S12.1 Culs-de-sacs or no-through roads                  The proposed development   does   not   involve
effective evacuation of users of premises    are not used in the street network                      reconfiguring a lot.
and access by Emergency services.            unless—
                                             (a) a perimeter road reserve with a
                                                 minimum reserve width of 20m and a
                                                 formed width of not less than 6m is
                                                 provided; or cul-de-sacs or no-
                                                 through roads are provided with fire
                                                 trails or access easements, capable
                                                 of being navigated by conventional
                                                 vehicles, that link to through roads
                                                 (see Figure 13.3 and Figure 13.4);
                                                 and

                                             S12.2 Roads have a maximum grade of            N/A      Not Applicable
                                             12:5% (1:8).                                            The proposed development   does   not   involve
                                                                                                     reconfiguring a lot.
                                             Figure 13.3—Consistent road network
                                             and lot
                                             layout




                                             Figure 13.4—Inconsistent road network
                                             and             lot             layout



1    Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
               A/S = Alternative Solution                                                                                              Natural Hazards Overlay Code.docx
               N/A = Not applicable to this proposal

521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain                                                                                                           Page 6
Log in to download the original file

Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses.pdf · 1.9 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.