Original source · versioned page text
Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses
NATURAL HAZARDS OVERLAY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
O12 Roads provide for the safe and S12.1 Culs-de-sacs or no-through roads The proposed development does not involve
effective evacuation of users of premises are not used in the street network reconfiguring a lot.
and access by Emergency services. unless—
(a) a perimeter road reserve with a
minimum reserve width of 20m and a
formed width of not less than 6m is
provided; or cul-de-sacs or no-
through roads are provided with fire
trails or access easements, capable
of being navigated by conventional
vehicles, that link to through roads
(see Figure 13.3 and Figure 13.4);
and
S12.2 Roads have a maximum grade of N/A Not Applicable
12:5% (1:8). The proposed development does not involve
reconfiguring a lot.
Figure 13.3—Consistent road network
and lot
layout
Figure 13.4—Inconsistent road network
and lot layout
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
A/S = Alternative Solution Natural Hazards Overlay Code.docx
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain Page 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.