Original source · versioned page text
Appendix Q - Planning Scheme Code Responses
NATURAL HAZARDS OVERLAY CODE
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
COUNCIL USE
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ACCEPTABLE SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS* COMMENTS
ONLY
Lot design N/A Not Applicable
O13 Lot design and building siting S13.1 Each lot includes a building The proposed development does not involve
minimizes bushfire hazard to people and envelope, identified on the plan of reconfiguring a lot.
property having regard to slope, aspect, subdivision—
existing vegetation and adequate (a) of sufficient size and dimensions to
separation from hazardous vegetation. accommodate a dwelling and
ancillary buildings and use areas; and
(b) for lots more than 2,500m—
i. conforming with the principles
for house site number 1, 2 or 3
shown in Figure 13.5—
ii. House sites in bush fire hazard
areas; and
iii. separated from hazardous
vegetation a minimum of 1.5
times the predominant mature
canopy height or 10m,
whichever is the greater; and
(c) for lots less than 2,500m2, maximize
separation of buildings from
hazardous vegetation.
S13.2 Residential lots are designed so N/A Not Applicable
that their size and shape allow for efficient The proposed development does not involve
emergency access to buildings for fire reconfiguring a lot.
1 Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
A/S = Alternative Solution Natural Hazards Overlay Code.docx
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
521 Elm Street and 10-22 Rose Gum Road, Black Mountain Page 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.