Original source · versioned page text
2020-07-07 P&E Agenda - Item 3 - Attachment 1 - TNC Project Management Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn 8. Project risk assessment
Risks and management interventions associated with the Project are outlined in Table 9. These risks describe the project operational risks only. Risk associated with
shellfish ecosystem restoration (e.g. impacts to habitat, marine species and users) are located within the MER Plan (Appendix 2).
Table 10. Project risks and management actions
Risk category Risk Description Pre- Management interventions Final rating
management
risk rating
Reputational Stakeholders not Project Lead fails to sufficiently engage MEDIUM 1. Key stakeholders mapped and identified during LOW
supportive of project stakeholders throughout duration of early planning phase of project.
project, leading to poor stakeholder 2. Open community forums held during planning
support, negative media, political phase and at key stakes thereafter. Listen and
intervention and potentially, project delays. respond to community views and perspectives.
3. Where possible, include methods of co-design
and/or consider community advisory groups.
4. Provide regular and transparent updates to
general public at key stages of the process (e.g.
through website, social media, presentations,
forums, media releases).
5. Provide opportunities for community to
participate and lead component of the project
(e.g. historical mapping, ecosystem building,
shell preparation, citizen science, ‘Friends of’
groups).
Traditional Owners Project Lead fails to sufficiently engage MEDIUM 1. Identify Traditional Owners and elders who can LOW
not supportive of Traditional Owners in co-design practices or speak for Country through Indigenous advisory
project seek advice on culturally sensitive issues groups, prescribed body corporates, or other
leading to alienation, negative media, government registers.
political intervention and potentially, 2. Identify cultural/environmental aspirations and
project delays. consider opportunities for incorporating into
planning and design (e.g. cultural mapping
included in habitat suitability models,
consideration of Traditional Ecological
41
BRING BACK THE FISH: PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.