Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-11 SM Agenda - Item 1 - Attachment 1 DRAFT 20191202-Noosa Plan Consultation Report
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Submitter Submission and Grounds of Submission Planners’ Response Recommendation
20868647 1, 2 and 4 Echelon Esplanade, Noosa North Shore The Major Conservation Area mapping is based on the zoning, which is why No. 2 and 4 are in Major That:
Conservation rather than the Rural Residential category on the Settlement Map.
Request long term protection by way of a statement of long term strategic intent confirming our existing • no change be made to the to the zoning
land use Lots 2 and 4 adjoining the ocean have been in an open space/conservation zoning since the 1985 • the koala habitat mapping be removed from property
planning scheme. They are also identified as being vulnerable to coastal erosion based on current and
Request reinstatement of a specific NNS locality future climate conditions. It is not appropriate that the lots be zoned to allow for any new dwelling houses • no change be made the Flood Hazard Overlay mapping.
No 1 is zoned Rural Residential but No. 2 and 4 are zoned Environmental Management and Conservation to be constructed on the land. • the effluent disposal requirements for 1%AEP flood immunity be removed from the
(in the Major Conservation category on Settlement Map 1). Yet none of the lots are Protected Areas or Noosa Plan and instead refer to the Plumbing Regulations to regulate the design
A reticulated sewerage system for Noosa North Shore is not planned or intended. Effliuent disposal and location of new systems.
Ecological Linkages on Biodiversity and Environment Map 4. There is some Connecting Habitat on No. 2. criteria in the planning scheme does not affect existing septic arrangements but any new systems will
All lots should be zoned Rural Residential. All lots should have the same extent of overlay mapping that need to meet best practice standards for advanced treatment and should be designed to manage flood
appears on Lots 28 and Lot 12 as they are in reality almost identical in terms of vegetation. inundation risk. The requirements for septic systems to meet the 1%AEP flood immunity can be removed
from the Noosa Plan as updated Plumbing Regulations can deal with this.
Review flood mapping – the land level is the same under my house extending westward some further 30m.
Agree there is no trees in the mapped area that would serve as potential koala habitat on the lots. This
What happens with my property now after council has introduced new 1% AEP flood maps that put most small area of mapping can be removed.
on-site effluent disposal systems outside the new criteria. When I replace my system I will not comply.
Council’s Hydrologist has provided detailed comments and in the absence of detailed survey information
There are no koala food trees in this area – remove koala mapping cannot support any amendment to the proposed Flood Hazard Overlay.
20856881 Noosa North Shore Association - Request the same rights and responsibilities afforded to those in the land Wording is included in the Strategic Framework, zone and use codes identify important values and That:
use categories elsewhere in the shire. This includes: development intent specific to Noosa North Shore.
• the Strategic framework settlement map be amended to show the urban land use
• All weather access roads of safe standard The Strategic Framework Settlement Map needs to show the Urban Area categories. designations on Noosa North Shore;
• Dust suppression on roads behind the 2 low density housing clusters The Ecological Linkage mapping from the Strategic Framework Biodiversity and Environment Map • the Ecological Linkage Mapping in the Strategic Framework be removed from small
• A long term solution to effluent disposal should not be shown over small urban lots where the size of the lot will limit connectivity potential. urban lots;
• Continued basic council services such as waste collection. • the Area of Biodiversity Significance and associated Connecting Habitat mapping
The native vegetation extent has been reviewed by Council’s Ecologist and can be revised in response to and Koala Habitat Mapping be amended to remove mapping over the cleared areas
Reinstate NNS as a locality in new Noosa Plan. recommendations to remove mapping from cleared areas. Koala habitat mapping and Connectivity on properties where recommended by council’s Ecologist;
Mapping should be amended to reflect these changes.
Need a statement in strategic framework that confirms existence of low density housing and rural • the Flood Hazard Overlay Code be amended to allow filling up to 3m around houses
residential footprints: The MSES layer cannot be removed by council, it is a state government layer. Owners can contact the in flood prone areas to facilitate access;
Department of Environment and Science to seek change. • no changes to flood mapping be made as a result of this submission; and
“On the Noosa North Shore the historic, existing low density housing clusters and residential rural footprint
will remain as it is today with no further subdivision permitted. These properties will enjoy the same The Riparian Buffer has been deliberately excluded from Low Density Residential properties given their • the effluent disposal requirements for 1%AEP flood immunity be removed from the
services, rights and responsibilities as other such zoned properties in the Shire have. Some 90% of the small lot area. Instead, a setback distance of not less than 10m from mean high water spring is required Noosa Plan and instead refer to the Plumbing Regulations to regulate the design
area is dedicated for conservation. Limited visitor accommodation and services are provided for in the through the Low Density Residential Zone Code. The riparian buffer has been mapped based on the and location of new systems.
Tourist Accommodation Zone”. methodology set out in the Waterways Assessment Report for Noosa Shire to ensure development does
not encroach into sensitive riparian areas to protect vegetation, habitat, soil stability and water quality.
Request that Council within its strategic framework mapping clearly identifies the appropriate land use The riparian buffer has been reviewed over individual rural residential properties in response to other
categories that provide for low density housing rights. submissions received.
It is unrealistic to apply the Ecological linkage mapping over the Low Density Housing clusters given the Filling in the Low Density Zone is allowed up to 10m3 without needing a planning approval. In the Rural
housing etc located over these lots. Residential Zone 100m3 is allowed with an approval. Beyond these volumes a planning assessment is
Remove MSES layer from Low Density Housing properties on NNS. required to assess the potential off-site impacts that filling may have on neighbouring properties to avoid
unintended drainage and flooding issues. Recommend changing the flood overlay code to allow for filling
Riparian Buffer is excluded from Low Density Residential properties but applies to Rural Residential around houses in flood prone areas upto 3m instead of the current 1m width.
properties. This is inconsistent. Amend to reflect the actual physical nature of the area along Maximillian
Road/Wood Lane. A reticulated sewerage system for Noosa North Shore is not planned or intended. Effliuent disposal
criteria in the planning scheme does not affect existing septic arrangements but any new systems will
Council needs to continue to work with NNS owners on the flooding and storm surge mapping to better need to meet best practice standards for advanced treatment and should be designed to manage flood
reflect actual conditions and local observations. inundation risk. The requirements for septic systems to meet the 1%AEP flood immunity can be removed
Property owners should be given the right to protect their properties and fill exactly the same way that from the Noosa Plan as updated Plumbing Regulations can deal with this.
Noosaville property owners have. Council does not support any additional building bulk on the river front that takes away from the natural
A solution is needed for effluent disposal for the Low Density housing and Rural Residential areas. New character of the foreshore area. Roof structures over jetties are not supported.
criterial puts most on-site septic systems outside the new criteria. Options may include a reticulated Hydrologist has provided detailed comments relating to Noosa North Shore. The flood hazard overlay
sewerage systems under the river for Noosa River Drive and Wygani Drive Properties and a local mini- represents a combination of flood events that have been determined by professional studies utilising
treatment plant for Maximillian Road properties. detailed data sets of terrain, rainfall and storm tides applied using best practice industry standards and
Koala habitat mapping around Wygani Drive is not accurate. Remove from Wygani properties. incorporating appropriate factors for sea level rise and rainfall intensity to reflect future climate conditions.
Resurvey vegetation on NNS properties to accurately map vegetation layers.
Previous concessions for jetties roof structures should be reinstated in recognition of vital transport role that
boats have for residents on NNS, and need for jetty shelters in inclement weather,
20868818 2 Wygani Drive Noosa North Shore Wording is included in the Strategic Framework to identify important values and development intent That:
specific to Noosa North Shore.
Request reinstatement of a locality for NNS and inclusion of a statement of long term strategic intent • the Ecological Linkage Mapping in the Strategic Framework be removed from small
confirming our existing land use. Council’s Ecologist has reviewed the vegetation mapping for individual properties and has recommended urban lots;
changes to better reflect the native vegetation extent on site. • the Area of Biodiversity Significance and associated Connecting Habitat mapping
Consultation Report - Consideration of Submissions on the New Noosa Plan Page 93
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.