Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition - principal submitter - Tracy Stevens

of 36

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (13.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

         Annexure    A



Specific Outcome of Code                  Applicant's Assessment         Submitter's   Assessment


RECONFIGURINGA lOT CODE


09 The subdivision layout is designed     09 Complies:                   Does not Comply
to facilitate linkages with adjoining     The proposal will comply       It is the applicant's responsibility to establish
sites in the immediate area.              where reasonably applicable.   how the DAcomplies with the Code. The
                                                                         applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
                                                                         details have been provided as to how the DA
                                                                         achieves this specific outcome. The phrase
                                                                         "reasonably applicable" is unclear and the
                                                                         specific linkages with adjoining sites in the
                                                                         immediate area have not been considered or
                                                                         adequately addressed.


010 Where the lots are to be used         010 Complies:                  Does not Comply
for Industrial business or Commercial     landscaped   buffering has     The layout does not provide for appropriate
business uses, the layout provides for    been provided along all        buffer areas, to mitigate possible impacts on
appropriate   buffer areas, to mitigate   boundaries adjoining the       the adjacent GSlC. landscape buffering is
possible impacts on nearby                school to the east.            insufficient and ineffective to mitigate the
residences or other noise sensitive                                      negative impacts, including those of fugitive
uses                                                                     emissions of the Development.


012 An adequate and accessible            S12.1-12.2 Complies            Does not Comply
water supply is provided for fire         Will comply as applicable.     It is the applicant's responsibility to establish
fighting purposes.                                                       how the DAcomplies with the Code. The
                                                                         applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
                                                                         details have been provided as to how the DA
                                                                         achieves this specific outcome. The Applicant
                                                                         has not adequately addressed the issue of
                                                                         fire safety and its potential impacts,
                                                                         particularly given the proximity of the
                                                                         Development to the adjacent GSlC.


032 Access easements     are in           S32.1 Complies                 Does not Comply
appropriate   locations for safe access   It is considered that the      It is the applicant's responsibility to establish
and egress, and supply appropriate        proposed access easement       how the DAcomplies with the Code. The
widths and levels of service for the      has been designed in           applicant has not satisfied this criteria as
number of vehicles that will utilise      accordance with Sections 2     sufficient details have not been provided as
them                                      and 3 of PSPS Engineering      to how the DAachieves this specific
                                          Design Standards - Roads,      outcome. The proposed access is not
                                          Drainage and Earthworks.       appropriate for the DA and does not provide
                                                                         safe access and egress, nor does it provide
                                                                         for the appropriate   level of safety of school
                                                                         children given its proximity to the GSlC


                                                                                                               29

Used in these records

About this file

File size
13.2 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Petition - principal submitter - Tracy Stevens.pdf · 13.2 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.