Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Petition - principal submitter - Tracy Stevens

of 36

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (13.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

      Eumundi Noosa Road, where the proposed retail shop is approximately 32% of the
      total GFA.


10.   It is also noted that given the proposed shop at 115 Eumundi Noosa Road will only be
      approximately 200 metres from the service station shop at 139 Eumundi Noosa Road
      and that they are both located on the same side of the road, the two service station
      shops will be in direct competition with each other. As such, the proposed shop will
      negatively impact on the service station shop at 139 Eumundi-Noosa Roadwhich has
      already been approved in June this year.


11.   In light of the above, the applicant has not established that there are sufficient
      grounds for the Noosa Council to approve the DA, despite the inconsistent use.
      Further, we contend, that there are no grounds on which the Noosa Council is justified
      in approving the DA, notwithstanding the conflict.


12.   Further, it is not appropriate for Noosa Council to approve a proposal which is directly
      and significantly in conflict with a formally expressed planning strategy.            This is
      supported by the following two planning grounds under the Noosa Planwhich directly
      relate to retail uses and land zoned Industry:


           •    DESIREDENVIRONMENTALOUTCOMES


13.   Part 3 of the Noosa Plan contains the Desired Environmental Outcomes (OED).
      Relevant to this issue,the DEOfor Commercial & Retail Usesstates at section 3.1.3:

           b) Commercial & Retail Uses


               "A hierarchy of centres with a range of Commercial and Retail business uses provide
               suitable levels of amenity, service and access to the community, consistent with the
               community's location and needs and is based on-


               viii. Uses that comprise a large component of Commercial and Retail business uses or
               other non-industrial    uses are not located on land that is otherwise intended for
               Industrial business uses; ..."


14.   Given that more than one third of the GFAof the proposed development is taken up
      by the proposed service station shop, it is considered that the DA comprises a large
      component of Commercial and Retail business uses and, as such, should not be
      located on Industry zoned land. Non-compliance with this DEOdemonstrates that the
      DA does not meet one of the key aims of the Noosa Plan, which is consistent with
      community expectation regarding retail intrusion into the industry zone.


           •    NOOSAVILLELOCALITYPLAN




                                                                                                  4

Used in these records

About this file

File size
13.2 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Petition - principal submitter - Tracy Stevens.pdf · 13.2 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.