Original source · versioned page text
Picture Point Sewer Options - Rev A
OPTION 1
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORKS
RE-LAY EXISTING SEWER ALMOST IN THE SAME ALIGNMENT, HOWEVER LOWER TO BE BELOW
THE PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
THE EXISTING MANHOLE LOCATED ON THE BOUNDARY OF 39 & 41 WILL NEED TO BE
DEMOLISHED AND RECONSTRUCTED IN THE SAME LOCATION. (HOWEVER, IT WILL BE DEEPER)
PERMISSIONS REQUIRED
43 1) UNITY WATER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE APPROVAL TO BUILD OVER PROPOSED
SEWER.
2) IF THE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE ON THE BOUNDARY OF 39 & 43 IS ACTUALLY
CONTAINED WITHIN 43 PICTURE POINT CRESCENT (AS CURRENT MAPPING SHOWS),
THEN OWNERS CONSENT FROM 43 PICTURE POINT CRESCENT IS REQUIRED.
.81
NEW SEWER MANHOLE IN SAME LOCATION
45
IL
US
39 PROS vs CONS
NEW SEWER PRO 1 - NO ADDITIONAL SEWER MANHOLES NEED TO BE ADDED.
EXISTING SEWER REMOVED
NEW SEWER CONNECTION PRO 2 - ALL WORKS WILL BE OUTSIDE OF THE BIO-DIVERSITY ZONES.
TO SERVICE DEVELOPMENT
.40
USIL 43
IL
40.0
4 DS PRO 3 - THE OWNER OF 43 PICTURE POINT CRESCENT WILL SEE NO CHANGE IN SEWER MANHOLE LOCATION.
EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE TO BE DEMOLISHED
43.37
USIL US IL
40.1 PRO 4 - NO VACUUM EXCAVATION REQUIRED (SUBJECT TO ARBORIST ADVICE)
OW
4
FL
40.24
DS IL
OF
EXISTING SEWER REMOVED
PRO 5 - 1 (ONE) SEWER MANHOLE REMOVED FROM UNITY WATER SEWER SYSTEM.
N
IO
CT
RE
NEW CONNECTION TO SEWER MANHOLE REQUIRED
DI
CON 1 - PERMISSION FROM 43 PICTURE POINT CRESCENT IS REQUIRED.
CON 2 - IF THE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE ON THE BOUNDARY OF 37 & 39 IS LOCATED ON 37 PICTURE POINT
CRESCENT, THEN PERMISSION IS REQUIRED FROM THE OWNERS OF 37 PICTURE POINT.
37
CON 3 - STRUCTURAL BRIDGING REQUIRED
SEWERAGE RETICULATION LEGEND
EXISTING PROPOSED ITEM DESCRIPTION
GRAVITY MAIN
DISUSED / ABANDONED GRAVITY MAIN
PROPERTY CONNECTION
MANHOLE STRUCTURE (MH)
OPTION 1 - IF BOTH NEIGHBOURS PERMISSION IS GRANTED MAINTENANCE STRUCTURE (MS)
1:200 @ A1
TERMINAL ENTRY POINT (TEP)
PRELIMINARY DRAWING
x 0.000 x 0.000 LOT CONTROL LEVEL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES STRUCTURE NAME
NOTES:
1. THIS IS A GENERIC LEGEND. NOT ALL ITEMS WITHIN THIS LEGEND MAY BE
PRESENT ON THIS PLAN AND THE SCALE OF THE ITEMS MAY BE DIFFERENT
TO THE ITEMS PRESENTED ON THIS PLAN.
Associated Consultant: Surveyor: RP Description: North: Client: Scale:
AMENDMENTS
PRELIMINARY
No. DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN No. DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN
.
.
. GRAYA AS NOTED
.
A 08.05.2022 PRELIMINARY ISSUE GF Plan Ref.: . . Project: Job No.
Level Datum AHD PROPOSED SEWER RE-CONFIGURATION OPTIONS
.
Size of Land: Orig. Drg. Size
TBC
. A1
T 1300 598 544
FOR PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCES
Approved: Drawn: Design: Drawing No.
IMAGERY, CADASTRAL AND SURVEY DATA DISCLAIMER
E [email protected] AT 39 PICTURE POINT CRESCENT
GF GT
While every care is taken by NAXOS Engineers Pty Ltd to ensure the accuracy of the data
supplied by local authorities, dial before you dig (dbyd) records, as constructed information
Ground Floor, Suite 1 NOOSA HEADS C102
and detailed survey, we make no representations or warranties about its accuracy, reliability,
424 Upper Roma Street, Brisbane 4000
NAME Checked: Supervisor: completeness or suitability for any particular purpose and disclaim all responsibility and all Title: Revision:
liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages PO Box 224, Spring Hill QLD 4004
RPEQ. . Date: . GT GT (including indirect or consequential damage) and costs which may be incurred as a result of
data being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason.
NAXOSENGINEERS.COM.AU SEWER OPTION 1 A
ON BEHALF OF NAXOS ENGINEERS
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.