Original source · versioned page text
Bulk_20200728154350 (2)
Noosa Council documents
Officer: Monkeith Kadhum
Direct Telephone: 07 53296293
Our Reference: OPW20/0108 MCU19/0089
Your Reference: BR190571
28 July 2020
Wessel Petroleum
C/- Acor Consultants
PO Box 3635
SOUTH BRISBANE QLD 4101
[email protected]
Dear Sir/Madam
Information Request
Planning Act 2016
I refer to your application and advise that Council requires further information to satisfactorily
assess the proposal.
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No. OPW20/0108 MCU19/0089
Street Address: 52-54 Mary St Noosaville Qld 4566
Real Property Description: Lot 21 RP 72829, Lot 1 RP 131598
Planning Scheme: The Noosa Plan (8 June 2018)
2. INFORMATION REQUIRED
The information requested is set out below:
Civil Engineering
Issue
Further details are required of the proposed driveway crossovers, particularly their longitudinal
cross-sections and their joining and integration with the proposed new 2.0m wide pathway.
Information Required
1. Provide the following information:
a. Detailed engineering plans for the proposed three crossovers including:
i. All relevant dimensions.
ii. The joining of the new pathway with the driveway crossover, demonstrating
smooth and compliant grades for pathway, and maintaining effective width of
the pathway at 2.0m; and any required pedestrian tectile and/or safety signs.
iii. Clearances between the edges of crossovers and existing public services,
particularly from the kerb lentil of the existing stormwater pit near Mary
Street entry driveway.
PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 1 of 5
Document Set ID: 21164971
Version: 2, Version Date: 28/07/2020 Print Date: 28 July 2020, 3:43 PM
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 4 pages
Page 2
Noosa Council documents
b. Longitudinal cross-sections for the three proposed driveways, prepared by suitably
qualified engineer, to demonstrate that a standard passenger car (B99) and AV
fuel tanker can entre and exit the development site without scraping the driveway
or the road surface, or bottoming down.
Issue
Required frontage works due to the development works.
Information Required
2. Provide or amend engineering plans to include the following details:
a. Relocating the existing large directional sign in accordance with the specifications
of DTMR that achieve acceptable clearance from existing and proposed
driveways.
b. Removal of the redundant existing driveways and reinstalment of the road verge,
pathway and kerb line to match existing and/or proposed new works.
c. Linemarking and parking signage, where required, to reinstate the two removed
on- street parking spaces.
Issue
Driveways’ clearances from existing and proposed public services.
Information Required
3. Confirm that edge of driveways comply with the normally required clearance of 1.0m
from existing and proposed public services (eg stormwater pit’s inlet lentil, power poles,
Telstra pits, water metres). Where the clearance is less than 1.0m, consultation and
written endorsement is required from the relevant authority.
Issue
Traffic management on the site during fuel delivery operation.
Information Required
4. Provide a site specific traffic management plan for the site during the fuel delivery
operation that include/address but not limited to the following:
a. Indicate on the plan the location of the fuel tanker (AV), fuel supplying points and
any required traffic control devices during the fuel delivery operation.
b. Identify the number of bowsers to be out of use during the fuel delivery.
c. Demonstrate that no obstruction to the entry into, and traffic circulation within, the
site during fuel delivery, particularly in relation to ensuring no impact on traffic flows
on the local roads (eg Mary Street).
Issue
Details are required regarding earthworks on site particularly the works associated with
removal of the old fuel tanks, the installation of the new fuel tanks and the construction of any
proposed underground tanks or structures, especially for underground works during high
water table and adverse conditions.
Information Required
5. Provide information in relation to the proposed earthworks on the site that
include/address but not limited to the following:
Page 2 of 5
Document Set ID: 21164971
Version: 2, Version Date: 28/07/2020 Print Date: 28 July 2020, 3:43 PM
Page 3
Noosa Council documents
a. Provide action plan prepared by a suitably qualified and registered engineer to
address all issues related to groundwater and Acid Sulfate Soil management for
the underground excavation and construction works, particularly during adverse
conditions (eg encountering acid sulfate soil, flooding, high water table).
b. Details for the dewatering measures during the excavation and back filling works
associated with works below ground level, including identifying any requirement
for any silt settlement tank and/or silt separator during the construction, and taking
into consideration the potential of adverse weather conditions and high water
table.
Issue
The submitted plans do not indicate any proposed bicycle facilities on the site.
Information Required
6. Provide information regarding any proposed bicycle facilities (eg bike racks) on the site.
Water Quality
Issue
Stormwater harvesting
Information Required
7. Condition 32 of MCU19/0089 and the MUSIC model submitted with the application
require 15kL of roof water harvesting tanks to be provided and plumbed for indoor non-
potable and outdoor use. Clarify whether the tanks will be detailed as above-ground
tanks with the BA or below ground tanks with this OPW? If above-ground, identify the
available space for the tanks and how they will connect to the surface drainage system.
If below-ground, provide full details so they can be approved with this OPW application
Also, show the integration of the tanks into the landscaping works.
Issue
Stormwater quality treatment and bioretention design - The site is very level-constrained due
to low surface levels and high (tidal) tailwater levels. These constraints are incompatible with
the adopted pit-and-pipe approach to conveying runoff to the bioretention basins. The OPW
drawings show the issues being exacerbated by lower outlet levels and greater level
differences between pavement and bio surface levels than presented at the MCU.
Information Required
8. Provide a revised design for the stormwater quality treatment system at the site which
addresses the following issues which are inconsistent with the Bioretention Technical
Design Guidelines (Water by Design, 2012):
a. Revise the design levels of the bioretention devices such that the controlling level
for the saturated zone sits within the transition layer and not at the base of the filter
media
b. Revise the design levels of the bioretention devices such that the base of the filter
media is above HAT. In the absence of tidal data for Weyba Creek, levels should
be based on the secondary port at Munna Pt.
c. Revise the design levels of the bioretention devices such that level differences
between the bioretention surface and adjacent pavement is <500mm.
d. Revise the flush grates specified for the bioretention devices for raised grates or
domed grates.
Page 3 of 5
Document Set ID: 21164971
Version: 2, Version Date: 28/07/2020 Print Date: 28 July 2020, 3:43 PM
Page 4
Noosa Council documents
e. Consider an alternative concept which drains pavement areas at-grade to
swales/bioretention and discharges roofwater to bioretention through surcharge
pits. Consider whether the discharge from the refuelling area treatment device
needs to be discharged to the bioretention device (also refer to the issue item
below).
Issue
There are concerns regarding any proposed connection of treatment devices/sumps from the
refuelling area into the stormwater disposal system.
Information Required
9. Provide details and confirmation regarding the disposal system of hydrocarbons
contaminated water from the site that include:
a. A pump out tank (blind tank) as the preferred method given the sensitivity of the
site to flooding and tidal water impacts and its proximity to an environmental
preservation area.
b. Provide advice on how the treatment device/s for hydrocarbons contaminated
water specified for the site will function during a flood event and/or a high tidal
event ie what prevents captured hydrocarbons from being released during adverse
weather and/or tidal conditions.
Landscaping
Issue
Some of the specified plant species on the landscaping plans do not comply with Planning
Scheme Policy 3 Landscaping Plants and Guidelines as required by condition 36 of the higher
order approval.
Information Required
10. Provide amended landscape plans which document compliance with condition 36 by
utilising local native species suitable for the locality.
Issue
Condition 36 (e) of the higher order approval requires advanced tree stock (min 100L) to be
planted west of the entry access on Mary Street. No advanced tree is shown in the location
on the submitted landscape plans.
Information Required
11. Provide amended landscape plans which document compliance with condition 36 (e) by
providing the required tree stock in the specified location.
Issue
Soft landscaping is shown on the approved higher order landscape plan between the northern
face of the building and the northern boundary. The submitted landscape plans for operational
works approval show the area as containing gravel. Gravel does not fit the definition of soft
landscaping in the Noosa Plan.
Information Required
12. Provide amended landscape plans showing the provision of soft landscaping between
the northern face of the building and the northern boundary, consistent with the
approved higher order landscape plan.
Page 4 of 5
Document Set ID: 21164971
Version: 2, Version Date: 28/07/2020 Print Date: 28 July 2020, 3:43 PM
Page 5
Noosa Council documents
General
Issue
Performance bond requirement.
Note: That bond payment is required in compliance with Condition 9 of the higher order
approval (MCU19/0089) prior to issuing a Development Permit for Operational Works.
3. DUE DATE FOR RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST
The due date for providing the requested information is 29 October 2020. Please advise
Council of your response to this information request in accordance with section 13 of the
Development Assessment Rules.
If you do not provide a response before the due date, it will be taken as if you have decided
not to respond to the information request and Council will continue with the assessment of
your application.
4. OTHER DETAILS
You can follow the progress of this application online at www.noosa.qld.gov.au. The “Online
Services” page can be accessed via "Quick Links" on the left hand side of the screen.
Should you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
me on the number above.
Yours faithfully,
Monkeith Kadhum
Development Engineer
Page 5 of 5
Document Set ID: 21164971
Version: 2, Version Date: 28/07/2020 Print Date: 28 July 2020, 3:43 PM