Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

_ASTP Town Planning Report

of 14

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

 Performance Outcome                                          Acceptable Outcomes
 Front fences and walls                                       AO17.1
 PO17                                                         Front fences or walls are set back an average of 1
 Front fences and walls are designed and sited to:            metre and are articulated to provide visual interest by
     a) contribute to the attractiveness of the               stepping the design at a maximum of 5 metre
          streetscape;                                        intervals.
     b) be compatible with the existing streetscape
          character;                                          AO17.2
     c) avoid interference with movement of                   N/A – proposal complies.
          surface stormwater;
     d) allow for casual surveillance of the street;          AO17.3
     e) provide planting in front of solid fences and         N/A – proposal complies.
          walls; and
     f) ensure plantings between the front fence              AO17.4
          and the footpath does not create an                 N/A – proposal complies.
          impediment for pedestrians using the
          footpath
 Response
 Proposed Unit 2 is to be provided with a 1.8 metre high fence along the front boundary of the site that is
 setback 600mm from the front boundary, with landscaping in front, in lieu of 1 metre as required by the Code.
 Further, the fence does not step in a 5 metre intervals. As such, the proposed front fencing does not comply
 with AO17.1 above.

 The proposal complies with PO17, however, given that the front fence consists of white aluminium columns
 that will be spaced to achieve 50% transparency, so as to not form a dominant feature of the streetscape.
 Given that the fence is not a solid structure and is raised out of the ground, the fencing structure will not
 impede stormwater flows through the site and will not inhibit the casual surveillance of the laneway. It is also
 noted that the front fence is buffered from the streetscape by a densely planted landscape bed that is 0.6
 metres wide, which will assist to soften the built form and screen the fence from the laneway. It is therefore
 determined that the proposal will contribute to the attractiveness of the streetscape. All planting will be
 designed such that it will not impede pedestrian or vehicle movement along the laneway.

 In summary, the proposal complies in full with PO17 of the Zone Code.

As demonstrated above, the development complies with all relevant elements of the Medium Density
Residential Zone Code and no further assessment against the code is required.


5.3       Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code
The proposed Dual Occupancy development complies with the Acceptable Outcomes of the Dual
Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code on the following basis:
      •    The subject site has access to essential services and facilities, including retail, commercial, social
           and medical facilities and public transport services with the nearest District Centre Zoned land
           being located just 40 metres from the site (PO1);
      •    The proposed development is not located on constrained land (PO2);
      •    The proposed development will not adversely impact on existing or future infrastructure
           including water or sewerage utilities, electricity or transport infrastructure. Please refer to the
           Services Advice Notice provided by Unitywater in Appendix 4, which details their support for the
           proposed Building Over Sewer outcome (PO3);
      •    The subject site has a frontage of 20 metres (10.5m required) (AO4);
      •    Shared driveways are not proposed (PO4);

ASTP Ref: 210705                                                                                     Page 11 of 14
Log in to download the original file

_ASTP Town Planning Report.pdf · 857 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.