_ASTP Town Planning Report

     •    The proposal Dual Occupancy does not form part of a mixed-use development (PO6);
     •    Both Dwelling units are provided with frontage and views to an adjacent streetscape, so as to
          enhance the opportunities for passive surveillance from the site. Both Dwelling units will present
          as detached houses from the street with the entrance to each Dwelling being legible (AO7,
          AO8.1-AO8.3);
     •    The proposed development dedicates 72.9% of the site to landscaping overall, with 79% of this
          being soft landscaping (AO10.1);
     •    Each Dwelling unit is provided with level private open space well in excess of the minimum 25m2
          required (Unit 1 – 421m2, Unit 2 – 317m2) (AO11.1 & AO11.3);
     •    Both Ruby Street and Opal Lane have speed limits less than 80km per hour (AO12.1); and,
     •    Car parking is provided in accordance with Table 9.4.1.4 in the Driveways and Parking Code
          (AO13).

Overall, the proposed development either complies with, or is able to be conditioned to comply with, the
Acceptable Outcomes of the Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code.



The proposed Dual Occupancy development provides vehicle parking in accordance with Table 9.4.1.4
Minimum parking requirements including end of trip facilities. Further, a review of the Driveways and
Parking Code confirms that the proposed development either complies with, or is able to be conditioned
to comply with, the remaining Acceptable Outcomes of the Code.



The subject site does not contain sloped land. As such, only minimal earthworks are required to construct
the proposed development. Overall, no areas of non-compliance were identified when assessing the
proposed development against this Code.



No areas of non-compliance were identified when assessing the proposed development against this Code,
given that the site does not contain underground stormwater infrastructure. Further, the proposed
development provides a stormwater management solution that will not cause nuisance to adjoining
premises or increase the maintenance costs for Council. Please refer to the Civil Engineering Plans
prepared by Ingeniir in Appendix 3 which details this.



No areas of non-compliance were identified when assessing the proposed development against this Code.



Please refer to the Landscape Plans prepared by Bird Landscape Design in Appendix 2, which detail the
proposed landscaping outcome. A review of the Landscaping Code confirms that the proposed
development either complies with, or is able to be conditioned to comply with, the Acceptable Outcomes
of the Code.



A review of the Sustainable Building Design Code confirms that the proposed development either
complies with, or is able to be conditioned to comply with, the Acceptable Outcomes of the Code.




ASTP Ref: 210705                                                                                Page 12 of 14