Original source · versioned page text
Gibson - Certification of design of prescribed tidal work
Attached to the e-mail Combined Application MCU22/0050 & OPW22/0092 - Cover Letter - Owners Consent - DA Form 1 - Certificate of Design - Certificate of Title - Plans - 38 Saltwater Ave, Noosaville.
Certification of design of prescribed tidal work
In relation to a proposal for a development approval for prescribed tidal work, this certification must
be completed and submitted by a suitably qualified professional engineer to certify that the design of
the prescribed tidal work is in accordance with the relevant Australian Standards, Schedule 3 – Code
for assessable development that is prescribed tidal works of the Coastal Protection and Management
Regulation 2017 and is suitable for intended use.
Re: Proposed Deck System
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for SJ & JV Gibson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
at Lot 322 (38) Saltwater Avenue, Noosaville
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Tim Peters, on behalf of EDGE Consulting Engineers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of PO Box 6148, Woolloongabba QLD 4102
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
state that:
1. I am a registered Professional Engineer of Queensland, under the provisions of the
Professional Engineers Act 2002 and have relevant experience in the design and construction
of prescribed tidal work.
2. I certify that:
(a) the works including any other associated works have been designed in accordance with
the relevant Australian Standards and Schedule 3 – Code for assessable development
that is prescribed tidal works of the Coastal Protection and Management Regulation
2017.
(b) The works: -
(i) are suitable for their intended use;
(ii) are designed to be structurally adequate for their intended location and
anticipated use;
(iii) are designed to be structurally adequate to allow for the scour resulting from
flood and tidal conditions;
(iv) are designed not to impose loads on existing structures such that the design
capabilities of these existing structures are exceeded (structures include walls
without limiting the definition of structures);
(v) are designed not adversely affect the stability of the bed and the banks of the
waterway in which the works are constructed and the works are designed for
significant scour;
(vi) are designed in accordance with all appropriate Australian standards and
guidelines except as detailed in the minimum design criteria in the
Environmental Protection Agency’s operational policy Building and engineering
standards for tidal works;
(vii) are designed not to adversely affect the usage of adjacent structures; and
(viii) have been designed to have a non-slip surface; and
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 1 page
Page 2
(c) the prescribed tidal work has been designed to comply with Schedule 3 – Code for
assessable development that is prescribed tidal works of the Coastal Protection and
Management Regulation 2017.
3. This certification does not cover the construction or installation of the works on site. The
Contractor shall confirm the adequacy of the site conditions during installation and shall advise
the Engineer if variation from details shown on the drawings occur. No detailed site
investigation or studies have been carried out by us or provided to us for consideration. The
design review has been carried out on the basis of limited enquiry only. Pile and land anchor
depths shown are applicable to founding in stiff clay or dense sand. There is some additional
risk of failure should the above design criteria be exceeded, or actual site conditions be inferior
to those assumed. If ground conditions other than those described above are encountered
during construction or seabed levels encountered are deeper than those shown on the
drawings, further advice should be sought. Safety in Design Considerations have been taken
into account as part of this design but are the ultimate responsibility of the contractor and end
user.
TIM PETERS RPEQ 5496
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Signed Print name and RPEQ registration number
(person making this declaration)
18/03/2022
-------------------------------------------------
Dated