Original source · versioned page text
Code Compliance Statement
Table 1.3 Network impacts
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO25 Development does not compromise the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO25
safety of users of the state-controlled road This Development Application will not compromise
network.
the safety of users of the state-controlled road
network:
▪ The existing access to McKinnon Drive will be
maintained, no changes are proposed.
▪ The Development Application creates one (1)
additional lot which introduces a negligible
increase in traffic generation associated with the
existing access.
PO26 Development ensures no net worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO26
the operating performance of the state-controlled The scale of the proposed development in the
road network.
context of the existing access point to McKinnon
Drive does not introduce a measurable net worsening
of the operating performance of McKinnon Drive.
The Development Application creates one (1)
additional lot which will not generate significant
traffic nor make a noticeable difference to the
operation of McKinnon Drive.
PO27 Traffic movements are not directed onto a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO27
state-controlled road where they can be The site has existing access onto Mckinnon Drive
accommodated on the local road network.
which will be maintained. The site does not have
alternative access to a local road network.
PO28 Development involving haulage exceeding No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO28 Not Applicable
10,000 tonnes per year does not adversely impact This Development Application does not involve
the pavement of a state-controlled road.
haulage exceeding 10,000 tonners per year.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.5
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 7 of 18
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original