Council archive · source document
Reference Document - MCU26 0001 & OPW26 0002 - AS PUBLISHED · MCU26/0001
Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Specific platform design would be required prior to mobilisation and trafficking of any heavy mobile
plant on the site (e.g. mobile cranes, concrete pumps or piling rigs)
Construction areas and surrounds should be graded to shed surface water runoff.
6.2.2 Excavations
Excavations through the soils encountered in the boreholes should be achievable using conventional
earthmoving plant (e.g. excavators with toothed buckets). Temporary unsurcharged cuts in the very
loose to loose sand could be formed at 1V:2H, and at 1V:1.5H in medium dense (or denser) sand for
batters up to 3 m in height. Flatter batters or temporary retention may be required if groundwater
seepage is encountered or if sloughing of dry sand occurs at the batter surface. Deeper unretained cuts,
if required, should be specifically assessed by Tectonic, unless supported by temporary retention
measures.
If filling or permanent cuts exceed 1 m, then these must be retained. Permanent cut and fill batters up to
1 m high shall not exceed 1V:2.5H. Any permanent soil and fill batters will require erosion protection
(e.g. revegetation or surface protection).
It is likely that above temporary batter slopes will not be able to be achieved, due to spatial restraints,
and so temporary shoring will be required (e.g. sheet, contiguous or secant piles), as per the
recommendations in Section 6.4 below. Excavations in close proximity to existing structures, including
on neighbouring properties, will need to be specifically designed to prevent undermining. It is
recommended that footing exposures or confirmation of foundations via certified building plans be
undertaken to assess the possibility of undermining. If undermining is a potential issue the existing
structures may need to be underpinned or excavations may require temporary shoring.
The advice of a suitably qualified and experienced RPEQ structural engineer must be sought regarding
any potential undermining and design and construction of any underpins/temporary shoring (if
required).
The above recommendations do not supersede any existing safety regulations or legislation applicable to
excavations (e.g. limits on personnel entry into trenches).
Due to the highly permeable nature of the sands at this site, stormwater is expected to rapidly infiltrate
the ground, making un-sealed surface drainage ineffective for the control of flows. Any sealed areas
should be graded to ensure free drainage of stormwater away from construction areas, and to a control
point(s).
6.2.3 Filling
The natural sandy soils where free of deleterious materials (e.g. vegetation, building debris etc.) may be
reused as structural fill, subject to appropriate moisture adjustment. It should be noted that compaction
of such relatively ‘clean’ sands as structural fill requires the addition of substantial volumes of water
(‘flooding’) combined with the use of vibratory compaction equipment (typically a smooth drum roller or
heavy vibrating plate).
Should importation of fill be required, it is recommended that such fill should comply with the following:
Minimum CBR of 10 %
Maximum plasticity index of 15 %
Shrink-swell index ≤ 1 %
Maximum particle size of 100 mm
Geotechnical Investigation
30 January 2026 | 25408-001-Rev0 12
Document Set ID: 25158026
24528612
Version: 1,
2, Version Date: 10/09/2026
13/02/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - MCU26 0001 & OPW26 0002 - AS PUBLISHEDRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.