Council archive · source document
Reference Document - MCU26 0001 & OPW26 0002 - AS PUBLISHED · MCU26/0001
Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Any fill should be compacted at moisture contents within the range of ±2 % of optimum moisture
content for Standard Compaction. Fill material should be placed in 250 mm thick (loose thickness) layers
and be compacted by repeated rolling using a minimum 4 tonne smooth drum roller (or equivalent, with
vibration on if safe to do so) to achieve a dry density ratio of at least 95 % of the maximum Dry Density
Ratio (DDR), based upon the Standard Compaction method, or a Dry Density Index of at least 70 %.
Confirmatory compaction testing must be carried out at regular intervals. A minimum of two tests per
vertical lift is recommended where structural fill heights are to exceed 300 mm. Further details for
control and testing of fill are given in Australian Standard AS 3798-2007 Guidelines on Earthworks for
Commercial and Residential Developments.
Fill embankment edges must be over-filled by half the width of the compaction equipment (horizontally)
and then trimmed back to well compacted material.
6.3 Building Foundations
6.3.1 Indicative Site Classification
Site classifications for footing design are determined in accordance with AS 2870-2011 Residential Slabs
and Footings, and depend on the depth of cut / fill undertaken at a site, variations in the natural soil/rock
depths, and the reactivity of the in situ soil / rock and any imported fill materials.
Based on the results of the investigation, the site is classified as Class P in accordance with AS 2870-2011
Residential Slabs and Footings, due to the presence of poor bearing capacity soils from shallow depths. If
not for this factor, the site would have the characteristics of Class S, with the estimated characteristic
surface movements (‘ys’) ranging up to about 20 mm. However, due to the potential variability in
subgrade density a site classification of Class M is recommended in relation to assessment of flexibility
requirements for ground slabs, footings and plumbing design.
6.3.2 Footing Design
No design loadings were available at the time of reporting. Footings for the proposed development and
any ancillary structures (e.g. retaining walls, etc.) must penetrate through any unsuitable natural soils (i.e.
very loose to loose sands) to found at least 0.5 m into medium dense (or denser) natural sands. Such
materials were encountered below depths of about 1.3 m BGL (existing ground levels) in the boreholes.
High-level footings or locally deepened pads could be utilised in most areas of cut, whilst piles would be
required elsewhere.
High level footings, where achievable in cut areas, may be designed using an allowable bearing pressure
of 100 kPa provided that they are founded in the natural medium dense (or denser) sands. Excavations
would likely loosen the sands, so densification of high-level footing bases should be allowed for, by
compaction with a vibrating plate, prior to placement of steel reinforcement.
Piles founded in medium dense (or denser) sands may be designed using an allowable end bearing
pressure (ABP) of 400 kPa. Should higher bearing pressure be required, deeper piles founded at least 1 m
into dense (or denser) sand (about 5 m BGL) could be designed using an ABP of 1 MPa.
Given the sandy soil profile, where piles are required, steel screw piles would commonly be adopted.
Due to the presence of loose sands, together with the close proximity to surrounding infrastructure, open
bored or driven piles are not considered to be appropriate for this site. Steel reinforced concrete bored
piles could be feasible; however, the use of sacrificial liners (e.g. ‘formatube’) would be required to
prevent the caving of upper loose sands. Grout-injected, continuous flight auger (CFA) piles could also
Geotechnical Investigation
30 January 2026 | 25408-001-Rev0 13
Document Set ID: 25158026
24528612
Version: 1,
2, Version Date: 10/09/2026
13/02/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - MCU26 0001 & OPW26 0002 - AS PUBLISHEDRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.